Evidence for cosmetics as a source of mineral oil contamination in women
- PMID: 21970597
- DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2011.2829
Evidence for cosmetics as a source of mineral oil contamination in women
Abstract
Background: There is strong evidence that mineral oil hydrocarbons are the greatest contaminant of the human body, amounting to approximately 1 g per person. Possible routes of contamination include air inhalation, food intake, and dermal absorption. The present study aims to identify the most relevant sources of mineral oil contamination.
Methods: One hundred forty-two women undergoing elective cesarean section were enrolled. A specimen of subcutaneous fat was removed prior to wound closure. On days 4 and 20 postpartum, milk samples were collected from the women. Fat and milk samples were analyzed for mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH). All women completed a questionnaire on personal data, nutrition habits, and use of cosmetics. MOSH concentrations in fat tissue were compared with data from the questionnaire and with MOSH concentrations in corresponding milk samples.
Results: The predominant predictor for MOSH contamination of fat tissue was age (p<0.001). Furthermore, body mass index (p=0.001), country of main residence (p=0.03), number of previous childbirths (p=0.029), use of sun creams in the present pregnancy (p=0.002), and use of hand creams and lipsticks in daily life (p=0.011 and p=0.007, respectively) were significant independent determinants. No association was found with nutritional habits. A strong correlation was seen between MOSH concentration in fat tissue (median 52.5 mg/kg) and in the corresponding milk fat sample from day 4 (median 30 mg/kg) (p<0.001) and day 20 (median 10 mg/kg) (p=0.028).
Conclusions: The increase in MOSH concentration in human fat tissue with age suggests an accumulation over time. Cosmetics might be a relevant source of the contamination.
Similar articles
-
Lack of human-relevant adversity of MOSH retained in tissues: Analysis of adversity and implications for regulatory assessment.Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023 Jan;137:105284. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105284. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36402242 Review.
-
Mineral oil in food, cosmetic products, and in products regulated by other legislations.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2019 Oct;49(9):742-789. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2019.1694862. Epub 2020 Jan 15. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2019. PMID: 31939687 Review.
-
Mineral oil and synthetic hydrocarbons in cosmetic lip products.Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016 Apr;38(2):194-200. doi: 10.1111/ics.12276. Epub 2015 Oct 7. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2016. PMID: 26352930
-
Mineral oil paraffins in human body fat and milk.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Feb;46(2):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.08.036. Epub 2007 Sep 5. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 17923223 Clinical Trial.
-
Lactation performance of rural Mesoamerindians.Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992 May;46(5):337-48. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992. PMID: 1600932
Cited by
-
In-situ oligomerization of lactic acid within broiler skin extracted elastin/collagen matrix for the efficacy of ointment base.Heliyon. 2022 Aug 28;8(8):e10346. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10346. eCollection 2022 Aug. Heliyon. 2022. PMID: 36082335 Free PMC article.
-
Skin safety and health prevention: an overview of chemicals in cosmetic products.J Prev Med Hyg. 2019 Mar 29;60(1):E50-E57. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2019.60.1.1080. eCollection 2019 Mar. J Prev Med Hyg. 2019. PMID: 31041411 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical