Hemodynamic profile of target-controlled spinal anesthesia compared with 2 target-controlled general anesthesia techniques in elderly patients with cardiac comorbidities
- PMID: 22609644
- DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318252e901
Hemodynamic profile of target-controlled spinal anesthesia compared with 2 target-controlled general anesthesia techniques in elderly patients with cardiac comorbidities
Abstract
Background and objectives: The impact of anesthesia techniques in patients experiencing hip fracture is controversial. This study compares the effects on blood pressure of 3 anesthesia techniques that are considered safe for the elderly.
Methods: Forty-five patients older than 75 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status III or IV, with cardiac comorbidities, and undergoing surgery for hip fracture, were randomized to receive continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA), propofol target-controlled infusion (TCI), or sevoflurane (SEVO). In CSA patients, a T10 metameric level target was achieved by titration of 2.5 mg of bupivacaine boluses. In patients on TCI and SEVO, a bispectral value target of around 50 guided the concentration of propofol or sevoflurane. Analgesia in the TCI and SEVO groups was provided with remifentanil. Hypotension was defined as a 30% decrease in mean arterial pressure and was treated with an intravenous bolus of ephedrine.
Results: The number of hypotension episodes was lower in the CSA group: 0 (range, 0-6) versus 11.5 (range, 1-25) in the TCI group and 10 (range, 1-23) in the SEVO group (P < 0.001). Both TCI and SEVO patients needed more ephedrine compared with CSA patients (30.5 [15.5], 26 [23], and 1.5 [2.5] mg, respectively, P < 0.001). The maximal decrease in mean arterial pressure was lower in the CSA group (26% [17%]) compared with that in the TCI group (47% [8%]) and the SEVO group (46% [12%]; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: In elderly patients, spinal anesthesia using titrated doses of bupivacaine provided better blood pressure stability than propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia.
Comment in
-
Is it simply a good spinal or merely a bad anesthetic?Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):164. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31827adc93. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23423129 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Drs Keaveney and O'Riain.Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):165. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31827d88fa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013. PMID: 23423130 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single shot spinal anesthesia with very low hyperbaric bupivacaine dose (3.75 mg) for hip fracture repair surgery in the elderly. A randomized, double blinded study.Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014 Nov;61(9):481-8. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Jul 21. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014. PMID: 25060950 Clinical Trial.
-
Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients.Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1559-63. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000218421.18723.cf. Anesth Analg. 2006. PMID: 16632842 Clinical Trial.
-
[Comparison between TCI-TIVA, manual TIVA and balanced anaesthesia for stereotactic biopsy of the brain].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2004 Apr;39(4):212-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-814363. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2004. PMID: 15098169 Clinical Trial. German.
-
Randomized comparison between sevoflurane anaesthesia and unilateral spinal anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery.Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Aug;20(8):640-6. doi: 10.1017/s0265021503001030. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003. PMID: 12932066 Clinical Trial.
-
Hemodynamic effects of spinal anesthesia in the elderly: single dose versus titration through a catheter.Anesth Analg. 1996 Feb;82(2):312-6. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199602000-00017. Anesth Analg. 1996. PMID: 8561333 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Comparing perioperative outcomes between regional anesthesia and general anesthesia in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Can J Anaesth. 2024 Feb 28. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02696-3. Online ahead of print. Can J Anaesth. 2024. PMID: 38418761 Review. English.
-
The Analysis of Multiple Outcomes between General and Regional Anesthesia in Hip Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 5;12(24):7513. doi: 10.3390/jcm12247513. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38137582 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparing the Effect of Spinal and General Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Patients: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Orthop Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):3254-3262. doi: 10.1111/os.13895. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 37753546 Free PMC article.
-
Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jun 13;18(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03903-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 37312156 Free PMC article.
-
General versus Neuraxial Anesthesia on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of the ACS NSQIP Database.J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 2;12(11):3827. doi: 10.3390/jcm12113827. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37298022 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials