A matter of hand: Causal links between hand dominance, structural organization of fronto-parietal attention networks, and variability in behavioural responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation
- PMID: 27405259
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.015
A matter of hand: Causal links between hand dominance, structural organization of fronto-parietal attention networks, and variability in behavioural responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation
Abstract
Considerable evidence suggests that, on a group level, human visuospatial attention is asymmetrically organized, with a right-hemispheric dominance. The asymmetrical organization of the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF) has been shown to account for the right-hemispheric dominance in visual attention. However, such account is by no means universal, and large individual differences in asymmetrical performance on visuospatial tasks have been reported. Furthermore, the variability in the SLF lateralization has been shown to correlate with behavioural asymmetries. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) enables to temporarily interfere with cortical activity. cTBS applied over the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) has been previously used to systematically study attentional asymmetries. Interestingly, large individual differences in the effectiveness of stimulation have been reported. In accordance with earlier both animal and human studies, one possible cause underlying these striking individual differences might lie in the structural organization of frontoparietal pathways subserving visuospatial attention. Thus, the current study employed diffusion tractography to examine the relationship between the variability in the structural organization of the SLF and the individual differences in attentional shifts induced by a modified cTBS (cTBSmod; triplets of pulses at 30 Hz, repeated at 6 Hz) applied over the IPS, as measured by a line bisection task. Consistent with previous studies, on a group level, cTBSmod applied over the right intraparietal sulcus (IPS) triggered a rightward bisection bias shift, and there were no significant effects of cTBSmod applied over the left IPS. However, further analyses demonstrated that both handedness and structural variability (as assessed based on hindrance modulated orientational anisotropy) within the middle and the ventral branches of the SLF predicted individual differences in the cTBSmod-induced attentional shifts. Our study thus suggests that the effects of cTBSmod over the IPS may depend on intra-hemispheric interactions between cortical loci controlling visual attention. To conclude, our findings provide converging evidence for the notion put forward previously that inter-individual variability in the structural organization of intra-hemispheric frontoparietal connections has important implications for the functional models of human visual attention. Moreover, we hypothesize that this may also be relevant for the understanding of attentional disorders and their rehabilitation.
Keywords: Continuous theta burst stimulation; Individual differences; Spatial bias; Superior longitudinal fasciculus; Visual attention.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Structural Variability within Frontoparietal Networks and Individual Differences in Attentional Functions: An Approach Using the Theory of Visual Attention.J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 29;35(30):10647-58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0210-15.2015. J Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26224851 Free PMC article.
-
Structural Organization of the Corpus Callosum Predicts Attentional Shifts after Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 18;35(46):15353-68. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2610-15.2015. J Neurosci. 2015. PMID: 26586822 Free PMC article.
-
Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Feb 24. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 25724234
-
The hybrid model of attentional control: New insights into hemispheric asymmetries inferred from TMS research.Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jul;74:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.023. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 25451041 Review.
-
Functional anatomy of dominance for speech comprehension in left handers vs right handers.Neuroimage. 1998 Jul;8(1):1-16. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0343. Neuroimage. 1998. PMID: 9698571 Review.
Cited by
-
Hemispheric Asymmetry in TMS-Induced Effects on Spatial Attention: A Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Sep 22. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09614-2. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychol Rev. 2023. PMID: 37736863 Review.
-
The subcortical and neurochemical organization of the ventral and dorsal attention networks.Commun Biol. 2022 Dec 7;5(1):1343. doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-04281-0. Commun Biol. 2022. PMID: 36477440 Free PMC article.
-
Altered functional connectivity and regional brain activity in a triple-network model in minimally conscious state and vegetative-state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct 10;16:1001519. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1001519. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36299294 Free PMC article.
-
The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation in understanding attention-related networks in single subjects.Curr Res Neurobiol. 2021 Jul 3;2:100017. doi: 10.1016/j.crneur.2021.100017. eCollection 2021. Curr Res Neurobiol. 2021. PMID: 36246510 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Connectivity alterations underlying the breakdown of pseudoneglect: New insights from healthy and pathological aging.Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;14:930877. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.930877. eCollection 2022. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36118681 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous