Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 25;13(1):185.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0894-y.

A novel rat model of stable posttraumatic joint stiffness of the knee

Affiliations

A novel rat model of stable posttraumatic joint stiffness of the knee

Andreas Baranowski et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Background: Animal models of posttraumatic joint stiffness (PTJS) are helpful in understanding underlying mechanisms, which is important for developing specific treatments and prophylactic therapies. Existing rat models of PTJS in the knee failed to show that the created contracture does not resolve through subsequent remobilization. Our objective was to establish a rat model of persisting PTJS of the knee and compare it to existing models.

Methods: Thirty skeletally immature male Sprague Dawley rats underwent surgical intervention with knee hyperextension, extracartilaginous femoral condyle defect, and Kirschner (K)-wire transfixation for 4 weeks with the knee joint in 146.7° ± 7.7° of flexion (n = 10 per group, groups I-III). After K-wire removal, group I underwent joint angle measurements and group II and group III were allowed for 4 or 8 weeks of free cage activity, respectively, before joint angles were measured. Eighteen rats (n = 6 per group, groups Ic-IIIc) served as untreated control.

Results: Arthrogenic contracture was largest in group I (55.2°). After 4 weeks of remobilization, the contracture decreased to 25.7° in group II (p < 0.05 vs. group I), whereas 8 weeks of remobilization did not reduce the contracture significantly (group III, 26.5°, p = 0.06 vs. group I). Between 4 and 8 weeks of remobilization, no increase in extension (26.5° in group III, p = 0.99 vs. group II) was observed. Interestingly, muscles did not contribute to the development of contracture.

Conclusion: In our new rat model of PTJS of the knee joint, we were able to create a significant joint contracture with an immobilization time of only 4 weeks after trauma. Remobilization of up to 8 weeks alone did not result in full recovery of the range of motion. This model represents a powerful tool for further investigations on prevention and treatment of PTJS. Future studies of our group will use this new model to analyze medical treatment options for PTJS.

Keywords: Contracture development; Myofibroblasts; Posttraumatic joint stiffness; Small animal model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the local ethics committee “Landesuntersuchungsamt Rheinland-Pfalz” (ID 23 177-07/G 13-1-043 E1).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical procedure. a Ascending transtibial drilling. b Two-millimeter condylar drill hole. c Descending transfemoral drilling. d Insertion of K-wire. e Bending and pulling of K-wire. f Fixation in 145° of knee flexion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Postoperative lateral X-ray of the knee joint. K-wire immobilization in a 145° flexed knee position
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Physiological extension deficit (baseline) in the knee joint of a rat. Graphical illustration of a lateral view of the leg in full extension
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Procedure of joint angle measurement. Graphical illustration of a rat on an acrylic glass rack (permeable to X-rays)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
MRI scans of the knee joint. MRI (proton density and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence) scan of the knee joint before (left) and after (right) passive hyperextension of − 45° shows posterior capsular lesion (marked with an arrow) and a posterior widening of the femoral growth plate (anterior part of the growth plate is marked with an asterisk) after the maneuver
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Box plots of extension deficits. Extension deficit (ED, left picture), arthrogenic extension deficit (AED, middle picture), and myogenic extension deficit (MED, right picture) of operated knee joints vs. controls. The difference in extension deficit between an intervention group and its control is defined as contracture. A highly significant difference between an operation group and the respective control is indicated by a hashtag (#p < 0.01). A significant difference between operation groups is marked by an asterisk (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. JBJS. 1981;63(6):872–877. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198163060-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dudek N, Trudel G. Joint contractures. Essentials Phys Med Rehabil 2 Philadelphia Saunders Elsevier. 2008;
    1. Jawa A, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Pathogenesis and classification of elbow stiffness. In: Operative elbow surgery: Churchill Livingstone. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2012. p. 409–16.
    1. Halar EM, Bell KR. Immobility and inactivity: physiological and functional changes, prevention, and treatment. Phys Med Rehabil Princ Pract. 2005;2:1447–1467.
    1. Trudel G, Uhthoff HK. Contractures secondary to immobility: is the restriction articular or muscular? An experimental longitudinal study in the rat knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(1):6–13. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90213-2. - DOI - PubMed
-