Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jul;46(5):874-879.
doi: 10.1111/ced.14623. Epub 2021 Apr 4.

No efficacy of biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: a randomized controlled trial

C Gaillard  1 , L Allain  1 , C Rouillon  1 , Y Desgue  2 , S Brucato  1 , L Peyro-Saint-Paul  1 , A Dompmartin  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

No efficacy of biofield therapy in the treatment of warts of the hands and feet in adults: a randomized controlled trial

C Gaillard et al. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Although biofield therapy is unexplained by scientific evidence, it has been practised for many years in numerous cultures for a variety of medical conditions. This study aimed to determine whether one session of biofield therapy with an experienced practitioner could treat warts on the hands and feet in adults. A single-blind, assessor-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was performed between April 2016 and November 2018. The enrolled participants had at least one wart on the hand or foot that had been present for at least 90 days and they were not using any other therapy for the wart. The primary outcome of this trial was the disappearance of the original wart 3 weeks after session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy vs. a sham session. No original wart had disappeared 3 weeks after intervention (0/64), which made the study impossible to conclude on the primary objective. There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning wart disappearance 3 weeks (P = 0.49) or 6 weeks (P = 0.40) after the intervention. Reduction in wart size at Week 3 tended towards a better result for biofield therapy but this was not significant (P = 0.27). No related adverse effects were observed. The major limitation of this trial was the short follow-up time for measurement of clinical outcome, which did not allow verification of the hypothesis. However, this study shows that 3 weeks after a session of proximal nontouch biofield therapy is an insufficient length of time to assess biofield therapy in comparison with a sham session. Based on this study, biofield therapy cannot be recommended to treat warts within 3 weeks.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rubik B, Muehsam D, Hammerschlag R, Jain S. Biofield science and healing: history, terminology, and concepts. Glob Adv Health Med 2015; 4: 8-14.
    1. Jain S, Mills PJ. Biofield therapies: helpful or full of hype? A best evidence synthesis. Int J Behav Med 2010; 17: 1-16.
    1. Jain S, Hammerschlag R, Mills P et al. Clinical studies of biofield therapies: summary, methodological challenges, and recommendations. Global Adv Health Med 2015; 4: 58-66.
    1. Mühlenpfordt I, Stritter W, Bertram M et al. The power of touch: external applications from whole medical systems in the care of cancer patients (literature review). Support Care Cancer 2020; 28: 461-71.
    1. Abbot NC, Harkness EF, Stevinson C et al. Spiritual healing as a therapy for chronic pain: a randomized, clinical trial. Pain 2001; 91: 79-89.

Publication types

-