Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;9(1):e001159.
doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001159.

Exploring the impact of pulse oximeter selection within the COVID-19 home-use pulse oximetry pathways

David Stell  1 , Jonathan James Noble  2 , Rebecca Hazell Kay  1   3 , Man Ting Kwong  1 , Michael John Russell Jeffryes  3   4 , Liam Johnston  3   4 , Guy Glover  5 , Emmanuel Akinluyi  6   3
Affiliations

Exploring the impact of pulse oximeter selection within the COVID-19 home-use pulse oximetry pathways

David Stell et al. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, portable pulse oximeters were issued to some patients to permit home monitoring and alleviate pressure on inpatient wards. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of these devices in some patient groups. This study was conducted in response to these concerns.

Objectives: To evaluate the performance characteristics of five portable pulse oximeters and their suitability for deployment on home-use pulse oximetry pathways created during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study considered the effects of different device models and patient characteristics on pulse oximeter accuracy, false negative and false positive rate.

Methods: A total of 915 oxygen saturation (spO2) measurements, paired with measurements from a hospital-standard pulse oximeter, were taken from 50 patients recruited from respiratory wards and the intensive care unit at an acute hospital in London. The effects of device model and several patient characteristics on bias, false negative and false positive likelihood were evaluated using multiple regression analyses.

Results and conclusions: All five portable pulse oximeters appeared to outperform the standard to which they were manufactured. Device model, patient spO2 and patient skin colour were significant predictors of measurement bias, false positive and false negative rate, with some variation between models. The false positive and false negative rates were 11.2% and 24.5%, respectively, with substantial variation between models.

Keywords: COVID-19; equipment evaluations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Plots showing the relationship between measurement bias (difference between test oximeter and reference oximeter measurements) vs (1) test pulse oximeter models (top left), (2) Fitzpatrick skin pigmentation scale (top right), (3) subject spO2 as measured by the reference oximeter (bottom left), and (4) subject age (bottom right). Zero bias is shown for each plot with a red dashed line. Error bars show the bias SD associated with each data group. spO2, oxygen saturation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . Clinical management clinical management living guidance COVID-19. World Heal Organ 2021:16–44.
    1. Greenhalgh T, Knight M, Inda-Kim M, et al. . Remote management of covid-19 using home pulse oximetry and virtual ward support. BMJ 2021;372:n677. 10.1136/bmj.n677 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jouffroy R, Jost D, Prunet B. Prehospital pulse oximetry: a red flag for early detection of silent hypoxemia in COVID-19 patients. Crit Care 2020;24:4–5. 10.1186/s13054-020-03036-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jumreornvong O, Yang E, Race J, et al. . Telemedicine and medical education in the age of COVID-19. Acad Med 2020;95:1838–43. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003711 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mukerji A, Shafey A, Jain A, et al. . Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in Ontario, Canada: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Can J Public Health 2020;111:804–11. 10.17269/s41997-019-00280-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-