Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):284.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02993-w.

An international Delphi consensus process to determine a common data element and core outcome set for frailty: FOCUS (The Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project)

Jeanette C Prorok  1 , Paula R Williamson  2 , Beverley Shea  3 , Darryl Rolfson  4 , Leocadio Rodriguez Mañas  5 , Matteo Cesari  6 , Perry Kim  1 , John Muscedere  7   8   9
Affiliations

An international Delphi consensus process to determine a common data element and core outcome set for frailty: FOCUS (The Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project)

Jeanette C Prorok et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Despite increased recognition of frailty and its importance, high quality evidence to guide decision-making is lacking. There has been variation in reported data elements and outcomes which makes it challenging to interpret results across studies as well as to generalize research findings. The creation of a frailty core set, consisting of a minimum set of data elements and outcomes to be measured in all frailty studies, would allow for findings from research and translational studies to be collectively analyzed to better inform care and decision-making. To achieve this, the Frailty Outcomes Consensus Project was developed to reach consensus from the international frailty community on a set of common data elements and core outcomes for frailty.

Methods: An international steering committee developed the methodology and the consensus process to be followed. The committee formulated the initial list of data elements and outcomes. Participants from across the world were invited to take part in the Delphi consensus process. The Delphi consisted of three rounds. Following review of data after three rounds, a final ranking round of data elements and outcomes was conducted. A required retention rate of 80% between rounds was set a priori.

Results: One hundred and eighty-four panelists from 25 different countries participated in the first round of the Delphi consensus process. This included researchers, clinicians, administrators, older adults, and caregivers. The retention rate between rounds was achieved. Data elements and outcomes forming primary and secondary core sets were identified, within the domains of participant characteristics, physical performance, physical function, physical health, cognition and mental health, socioenvironmental circumstances, frailty measures, and other.

Conclusion: It is anticipated that implementation and uptake of the frailty core set will enable studies to be collectively analyzed to better inform care for persons living with frailty and ultimately improve their outcomes. Future work will focus on identification of measurement tools to be used in the application of the frailty core set.

Keywords: COMET; Common data elements; Core outcome set; Delphi; Frailty; OMERACT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
FOCUS Delphi consensus process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of panelists by country
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of panelists by stakeholder group in each Delphi round. * 1 caregiver passed away during the course of the study; therefore the caregiver denominator was 10 for round 2
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (2011). Global Health and Aging Report. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf.
    1. WHO Clinical Consortium on Healthy Ageing. Report of consortium meeting 1–2 December 2016 in Geneva, Switzerland. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (WHO/FWC/ALC/17.2)
    1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Carpena-Ruiz M, Montero-Errasquín B, Sánchez-Castellano C, Sánchez-García E. Exclusion of older adults from ongoing clinical trials about type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(5):734–738. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12215. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindley RI. Drug trials for older people. J Gerontol A Biomed Sci Med Sci. 2011;67(2):152–157. - PubMed
    1. van Deudekom FJ, Postmus I, van der Ham DJ, Pothof AB, Broekhuizen K, Blauw GJ, et al. External validity of randomized controlled trials in older adults, a systematic review. PloS one. 2017;12(3):e0174053. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-