Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 26;12(1):101.
doi: 10.3390/cells12010101.

Inferencing Bulk Tumor and Single-Cell Multi-Omics Regulatory Networks for Discovery of Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

Affiliations
Review

Inferencing Bulk Tumor and Single-Cell Multi-Omics Regulatory Networks for Discovery of Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

Qing Ye et al. Cells. .

Abstract

There are insufficient accurate biomarkers and effective therapeutic targets in current cancer treatment. Multi-omics regulatory networks in patient bulk tumors and single cells can shed light on molecular disease mechanisms. Integration of multi-omics data with large-scale patient electronic medical records (EMRs) can lead to the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets. In this review, multi-omics data harmonization methods were introduced, and common approaches to molecular network inference were summarized. Our Prediction Logic Boolean Implication Networks (PLBINs) have advantages over other methods in constructing genome-scale multi-omics networks in bulk tumors and single cells in terms of computational efficiency, scalability, and accuracy. Based on the constructed multi-modal regulatory networks, graph theory network centrality metrics can be used in the prioritization of candidates for discovering biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Our approach to integrating multi-omics profiles in a patient cohort with large-scale patient EMRs such as the SEER-Medicare cancer registry combined with extensive external validation can identify potential biomarkers applicable in large patient populations. These methodologies form a conceptually innovative framework to analyze various available information from research laboratories and healthcare systems, accelerating the discovery of biomarkers and therapeutic targets to ultimately improve cancer patient survival outcomes.

Keywords: Prediction Logic Boolean Implication Networks (PLBINs); SEER-Medicare; biomarkers; electronic medical records (EMRs); multi-omics regulatory networks; network centrality; single cells; therapeutic targets.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

N.L.G. is the inventor of the patent PCT/US22/75136 filed and owned by West Virginia University. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Constructing a relevance network using Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of a discrete Bayesian network.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of a static Bayesian network (A) and a dynamic Bayesian network (B).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Example of a Boolean network. (A). A simple Boolean network GN, E. (B). The state transition corresponding to the linkage graph GN, E of A. (C). The truth table of this network.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example of a Boolean implication rule. (A). Inducing an implication rule based on quadrants of the categorized expression levels of gene A and gene B. The intermediate areas in gray are removed from the implication rule induction. (B). Six specific implication rules connecting gene A and gene B.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Contingency table of the Boolean implication rule and their corresponding error cells in prediction logic.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The basic structure of neural networks.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Distribution of centrality metrics in single-cell gene co-expression networks with CD27, CTLA4, or PD1 ranked within the top 10th percentile. Each subplot represented a centrality metric: (A). Degree centrality; (B). Closeness centrality; (C). Betweenness centrality; (D). VoteRank centrality. Each violin plot showed the distribution of the centrality metric in one specific network: I. T-cell PBL gene co-expression network in normal samples. II. T-cell PBL gene co-expression network in NSCLC patients. III. T-cell gene co-expression network in NSCLC tumors.
Figure 9
Figure 9
The comparison of centrality metrics of our published single B-cell network vs. randomly selected networks with the same number of genes. The p values showed the percentage of randomly selected genes having a higher ranked average centrality metric than the clinically relevant single B-cell network. Each column in the plot showed a centrality metric: I. Degree centrality; II. Eigenvector centrality; III. Closeness centrality; IV. Betweenness centrality; V. VoteRank centrality. Each row represented a single-cell gene co-expression network constructed in normal PBL T cells, NSCLC PBL T cells, tumor infiltrating T cells, normal B cells, and tumor infiltrating B cells, respectively. NS: not statistically significant.

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cancer Moonshot℠. [(accessed on 4 December 2022)]; Available online: https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/moonshot-cancer-initiative.
    1. Soda M., Choi Y.L., Enomoto M., Takada S., Yamashita Y., Ishikawa S., Fujiwara S., Watanabe H., Kurashina K., Hatanaka H., et al. Identification of the transforming EML4-ALK fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature. 2007;448:561–566. doi: 10.1038/nature05945. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patsoukis N., Wang Q., Strauss L., Boussiotis V.A. Revisiting the PD-1 pathway. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabd2712. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2712. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chaft J.E., Rimner A., Weder W., Azzoli C.G., Kris M.G., Cascone T. Evolution of systemic therapy for stages I-III non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021;18:547–557. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00501-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

-