Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug 30:382:e072348.
doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348.

Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Affiliations
Review

Balancing risks and benefits of cannabis use: umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and observational studies

Marco Solmi et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically assess credibility and certainty of associations between cannabis, cannabinoids, and cannabis based medicines and human health, from observational studies and randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

Design: Umbrella review.

Data sources: PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, up to 9 February 2022.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies and RCTs that have reported on the efficacy and safety of cannabis, cannabinoids, or cannabis based medicines were included. Credibility was graded according to convincing, highly suggestive, suggestive, weak, or not significant (observational evidence), and by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) (RCTs). Quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2). Sensitivity analyses were conducted.

Results: 101 meta-analyses were included (observational=50, RCTs=51) (AMSTAR 2 high 33, moderate 31, low 32, or critically low 5). From RCTs supported by high to moderate certainty, cannabis based medicines increased adverse events related to the central nervous system (equivalent odds ratio 2.84 (95% confidence interval 2.16 to 3.73)), psychological effects (3.07 (1.79 to 5.26)), and vision (3.00 (1.79 to 5.03)) in people with mixed conditions (GRADE=high), improved nausea/vomit, pain, spasticity, but increased psychiatric, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence among others (GRADE=moderate). Cannabidiol improved 50% reduction of seizures (0.59 (0.38 to 0.92)) and seizure events (0.59 (0.36 to 0.96)) (GRADE=high), but increased pneumonia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For chronic pain, cannabis based medicines or cannabinoids reduced pain by 30% (0.59 (0.37 to 0.93), GRADE=high), across different conditions (n=7), but increased psychological distress. For epilepsy, cannabidiol increased risk of diarrhoea (2.25 (1.33 to 3.81)), had no effect on sleep disruption (GRADE=high), reduced seizures across different populations and measures (n=7), improved global impression (n=2), quality of life, and increased risk of somnolence (GRADE=moderate). In the general population, cannabis worsened positive psychotic symptoms (5.21 (3.36 to 8.01)) and total psychiatric symptoms (7.49 (5.31 to 10.42)) (GRADE=high), negative psychotic symptoms, and cognition (n=11) (GRADE=moderate). In healthy people, cannabinoids improved pain threshold (0.74 (0.59 to 0.91)), unpleasantness (0.60 (0.41 to 0.88)) (GRADE=high). For inflammatory bowel disease, cannabinoids improved quality of life (0.34 (0.22 to 0.53) (GRADE=high). For multiple sclerosis, cannabinoids improved spasticity, pain, but increased risk of dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, somnolence (GRADE=moderate). For cancer, cannabinoids improved sleep disruption, but had gastrointestinal adverse events (n=2) (GRADE=moderate). Cannabis based medicines, cannabis, and cannabinoids resulted in poor tolerability across various conditions (GRADE=moderate). Evidence was convincing from observational studies (main and sensitivity analyses) in pregnant women, small for gestational age (1.61 (1.41 to 1.83)), low birth weight (1.43 (1.27 to 1.62)); in drivers, car crash (1.27 (1.21 to 1.34)); and in the general population, psychosis (1.71 (1.47 to 2.00)). Harmful effects were noted for additional neonatal outcomes, outcomes related to car crash, outcomes in the general population including psychotic symptoms, suicide attempt, depression, and mania, and impaired cognition in healthy cannabis users (all suggestive to highly suggestive).

Conclusions: Convincing or converging evidence supports avoidance of cannabis during adolescence and early adulthood, in people prone to or with mental health disorders, in pregnancy and before and while driving. Cannabidiol is effective in people with epilepsy. Cannabis based medicines are effective in people with multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, inflammatory bowel disease, and in palliative medicine but not without adverse events.

Study registration: PROSPERO CRD42018093045.

Funding: None.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: MS received honoraria/has been a consultant for AbbVie, Angelini, Lundbeck, Otsuka. DC has received grant monies for research from Eli Lilly, Janssen Cilag, Roche, Allergen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Lundbeck, Astra Zeneca, Hospira; Travel Support and Honoraria for Talks and Consultancy from Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra Zeneca, Lundbeck, Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, Organon, Sanofi-Aventis, Wyeth, Hospira, Servier, Seqirus; and is a current or past Advisory Board Member for Lu AA21004: Lundbeck; Varenicline: Pfizer; Asenapine: Lundbeck; Aripiprazole LAI: Lundbeck; Lisdexamfetamine: Shire; Lurasidone: Servier; Brexpiprazole: Lundbeck; Treatment Resistant Depression: LivaNova; Cariprazine: Seqirus. He is founder of the Optimal Health Program, currently operating as Optimal Health Australia; and is part owner of Clarity Healthcare. He is on the scientific advisory of The Mental Health Foundation of Australia. He does not knowingly have stocks or shares in any pharmaceutical company. EV has received grants and served as consultant, advisor or CME speaker for the following entities: AB-Biotics, AbbVie, Angelini, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celon Pharma, Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, Ferrer, Gedeon Richter, GH Research, Glaxo-Smith Kline, Janssen, Lundbeck, Novartis, Orion Corporation, Organon, Otsuka, Sage, Sanofi-Aventis, Sunovion, Takeda, and Viatris, outside of the submitted work. CUC has been a consultant or advisor to or have received honoraria from: AbbVie, Acadia, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedAvante-ProPhase, MedInCell, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mylan, Neurocrine, Newron, Noven, Otsuka, Pharmabrain, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Seqirus, SK Life Science, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Takeda, Teva, and Viatris. He provided expert testimony for Janssen and Otsuka. He served on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Lundbeck, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Supernus, and Teva. He has received grant support from Janssen and Takeda. He received royalties from UpToDate and is also a stock option holder of Cardio Diagnostics, Mindpax, and LB Pharma.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Study selection flow. References of excluded studies after full text assessment available in supplementary table 3. *One meta-analysis included both observational and randomised controlled trials
Fig 2
Fig 2
Moderate and high certainty evidence according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), from randomised controlled trials on outcomes of cannabis based medications in people with chronic pain, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer. Only associations for which an eOR was available are displayed. Results are displayed in descending order of level of evidence and effect size. CBM=cannabis based medications eOR=equivalent odds ratio; H=high; M=moderate
Fig 3
Fig 3
Moderate and high certainty evidence according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), from randomised controlled trials on outcomes of cannabis based medications (CBD) in people with epilepsy. Results are displayed in descending order of level of evidence and effect size; only associations for which an eOR was available are displayed. eOR=equivalent odds ratio; H=high; M=moderate
Fig 4
Fig 4
Observational meta-analytical associations between cannabis and outcomes in pregnant women, drivers, and people with psychosis supported by convincing, highly suggestive, or suggestive evidence in main or sensitivity analysis. Results are displayed in descending order of level of evidence and effect size; only associations for which an eOR was available are displayed. n=cases; N=population; CE=class of evidence (convincing (I), highly suggestive (II), suggestive (III), weak (IV)); CES=class of evidence after removing the n>1000 cases criterion; eOR=equivalent odds ratio; NR=not reported
Fig 5
Fig 5
Observational meta-analytical associations between cannabis and outcomes in the general population and healthy people supported by convincing, highly suggestive, or suggestive evidence in main or sensitivity analysis excluding 1000 cases criterion. Results are displayed in descending order of level of evidence and effect size; only associations for which an eOR was available are displayed. n=cases; N=population; CE=class of evidence (convincing (I), highly suggestive (II), suggestive (III), weak (IV)); CES=class of evidence after removing the n>1000 cases criterion; eOR=equivalent odds ratio; NR=not reported

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pertwee RG. The diverse CB1 and CB2 receptor pharmacology of three plant cannabinoids: delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol and delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin. Br J Pharmacol 2008;153:199-215. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707442 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sharkey KA, Wiley JW. The role of the endocannabinoid system in the brain-gut axis. Gastroenterology 2016;151:252-66. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.04.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zou S, Kumar U. Cannabinoid receptors and the endocannabinoid system: signaling and function in the central nervous system. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:833. 10.3390/ijms19030833 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. ElSohly MA, Slade D. Chemical constituents of marijuana: The complex mixture of natural cannabinoids. In: Life Sciences. Life Sci, 2005: 539-48. - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharyya S, Morrison PD, Fusar-Poli P, et al. . Opposite effects of δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on human brain function and psychopathology. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010;35:764-74. 10.1038/npp.2009.184 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-