Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Feb 1;53(2):afae013.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afae013.

Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study

Affiliations

Core requirements of frailty screening in the emergency department: an international Delphi consensus study

Elizabeth Moloney et al. Age Ageing. .

Abstract

Introduction: Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes among patients attending emergency departments (EDs). While multiple frailty screens are available, little is known about which variables are important to incorporate and how best to facilitate accurate, yet prompt ED screening. To understand the core requirements of frailty screening in ED, we conducted an international, modified, electronic two-round Delphi consensus study.

Methods: A two-round electronic Delphi involving 37 participants from 10 countries was undertaken. Statements were generated from a prior systematic review examining frailty screening instruments in ED (logistic, psychometric and clinimetric properties). Reflexive thematic analysis generated a list of 56 statements for Round 1 (August-September 2021). Four main themes identified were: (i) principles of frailty screening, (ii) practicalities and logistics, (iii) frailty domains and (iv) frailty risk factors.

Results: In Round 1, 13/56 statements (23%) were accepted. Following feedback, 22 new statements were created and 35 were re-circulated in Round 2 (October 2021). Of these, 19 (54%) were finally accepted. It was agreed that ideal frailty screens should be short (<5 min), multidimensional and well-calibrated across the spectrum of frailty, reflecting baseline status 2-4 weeks before presentation. Screening should ideally be routine, prompt (<4 h after arrival) and completed at first contact in ED. Functional ability, mobility, cognition, medication use and social factors were identified as the most important variables to include.

Conclusions: Although a clear consensus was reached on important requirements of frailty screening in ED, and variables to include in an ideal screen, more research is required to operationalise screening in clinical practice.

Keywords: Delphi consensus; emergency department; frailty screening; older adult; older people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Methods flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary results of Rounds 1 and 2 of the e-Delphi consensus.

Similar articles

References

    1. DeDonato E, Hall SE, Hogan TM, Gleason LJ. Interprofessional education of emergency department team on falls in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68: E7–9. - PubMed
    1. Ukkonen M, Jämsen E, Zeitlin Ret al. . Emergency department visits in older patients: a population-based survey. BMC Emerg Med 2019; 19: 20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381: 752–62. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013 Oct 19;382(9901):1328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Caoimh R, Sezgin D, O’Donovan MRet al. . Prevalence of frailty in 62 countries across the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level studies. Age Ageing 2021; 50: 96–104. - PubMed
    1. Dam CS van, Trappenburg MC, Ter Wee MMet al. . The prognostic accuracy of clinical judgment versus a validated frailty screening instrument in older patients at the emergency department: findings of the AmsterGEM study. Ann Emerg Med 2022; 80: 422–31. - PubMed
-