Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 18;17(1):24.
doi: 10.1186/s13041-024-01098-2.

Spatiotemporal dynamics of the CD11c+ microglial population in the mouse brain and spinal cord from developmental to adult stages

Affiliations

Spatiotemporal dynamics of the CD11c+ microglial population in the mouse brain and spinal cord from developmental to adult stages

Kohei Nomaki et al. Mol Brain. .

Abstract

CD11c-positive (CD11c+) microglia have attracted considerable attention because of their potential implications in central nervous system (CNS) development, homeostasis, and disease. However, the spatiotemporal dynamics of the proportion of CD11c+ microglia in individual CNS regions are poorly understood. Here, we investigated the proportion of CD11c+ microglia in six CNS regions (forebrain, olfactory bulb, diencephalon/midbrain, cerebellum, pons/medulla, and spinal cord) from the developmental to adult stages by flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analyses using a CD11c reporter transgenic mouse line, Itgax-Venus. We found that the proportion of CD11c+ microglia in total microglia varied between CNS regions during postnatal development. Specifically, the proportion was high in the olfactory bulb and cerebellum at postnatal day P(4) and P7, respectively, and approximately half of the total microglia were CD11c+. The proportion declined sharply in all regions to P14, and the low percentage persisted over P56. In the spinal cord, the proportion of CD11c+ microglia was also high at P4 and declined to P14, but increased again at P21 and thereafter. Interestingly, the distribution pattern of CD11c+ microglia in the spinal cord markedly changed from gray matter at P4 to white matter at P21. Collectively, our findings reveal the differences in the spatiotemporal dynamics of the proportion of CD11c+ microglia among CNS regions from early development to adult stages in normal mice. These findings improve our understanding of the nature of microglial heterogeneity and its dynamics in the CNS.

Keywords: Adult; Brain; CD11c+ microglia; Mouse; Pre/postnatal development; Spatiotemporal dynamics; Spinal cord.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CD11c+ cells in the brain of Itgax-Venus mice at P4. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Venus+ (CD11c+) cells in the whole brain of Itgax-Venus mice at P4. Each brain region for quantitative analyses in further experiments is indicated by dashed lines. (B) Immunolabeling of Venus+ cells (green) with IBA1 (red) in the forebrain. Scale bars, 1000 μm (A) and 50 μm (B)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow cytometry analysis of the proportion of CD11c+ microglia in the forebrain. (A) Gating strategy for the CD11c+ and CD11cneg microglia (CD11b+ CD45low CD206neg cells with and without Venus fluorescence in red and blue squares, respectively) in the forebrain of Itgax-Venus mice at P4. (B) qPCR analysis of P2ry12, Igf1, Clec7a, and Trem2 mRNA expression in FACS-isolated CD11cneg and CD11c+ microglia from the forebrain at P4 (n = 5 mice). Values represent the relative ratio of the mRNA levels (normalized to Actb mRNA) of the CD11cneg microglia group. (C) Temporal analysis of the proportion of CD11c+ microglia in the forebrain from P0 to P56 (n = 4–8 mice for each time point tested). The proportion of CD11c+ microglia is indicated as the percentage of Venus+ cells in the total microglia (CD11b+ CD45low CD206neg cells). The proportion of CD11chigh microglia (the upper half of CD11c+ microglia in the scattered plot) to CD11c+ microglia at P4 and P21 was also analyzed. Data are shown as means ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Spatiotemporal analysis of CD11c+ microglia in other brain regions. Flow cytometric analysis of the percentage of CD11c+ (upper panels) and CD11chigh (lower panels) microglia per total microglia (CD11b+ CD45low CD206neg cells) at P4, P7, and P21 (n = 4 mice at each time point). Data are shown as means ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CD11c+ microglia in the prenatal mouse brain. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Venus+ (CD11c+; green) cells in the whole brain of Itgax-Venus mice at E14.5. The parenchymal brain region was indicated by a dashed line. Venus+ cells (green) were colocalized with IBA1 (red). Scale bars, 1000 μm (left panel) and 100 μm (right panel). (B) Flow cytometry analysis of the percentage of CD11c+ microglia per total microglia (CD11b+ CD45low CD206neg cells) at E12.5, E14.5, and E16.5 (n = 6–8 mice for each time point tested). Data are shown as means ± SEM. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Temporal analysis of CD11c+ microglia in the mouse spinal cord. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Venus+ (CD11c+; green) cells in the spinal cord of Itgax-Venus mice at E12.5 and E14.5. Venus+ cells (green) were colocalized with IBA1 (red) in the spinal cord. Scale bars, 500 μm. (B) Representative scattered plot of CD11cneg and CD11c+ microglia (blue and red square, respectively) in the spinal cord of Itgax-Venus mice at P4. (C) qPCR analysis of P2ry12, Igf1, Clec7a, and Trem2 mRNA in FACS-isolated CD11cneg and CD11c+ microglia in the spinal cord at P4 (n = 7 mice). Values represent the relative ratio of the mRNA levels (normalized to Actb mRNA) of CD11cneg microglia group. (D) Temporal analysis of the percentage of CD11c+ and CD11chigh microglia per total microglia (CD11b+ CD45low CD206neg cells) during development and adult (n = 4–10 mice for each time point tested). Data are shown as means ± SEM. ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Spatial changes in spinal CD11c+ microglia during development. (A) Representative immunofluorescence images of Venus+ (CD11c+; green) cells in the spinal cord of Itgax-Venus mice at P4, P14, P7, P21, P28, and P56. GM regions are indicated by dashed lines. (B) High magnification images of the areas (indicated by white arrowheads in panel A). Dashed lines indicate the boundary between WM and GM. Scale bars, 1000 μm (A) and 200 μm (B)

Similar articles

References

    1. Li Q, Barres BA. Microglia and macrophages in brain homeostasis and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18:225–42. doi: 10.1038/nri.2017.125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Prinz M, Jung S, Priller J. Microglia biology: one century of evolving concepts. Cell. 2019;179:292–311. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.053. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, David E, Baruch K, Lara-Astaiso D, Toth B, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 2017;169:1276–e12901217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Masuda T, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, Bottcher C, Amann L, Sagar; Scheiwe C, Nessler S, Kunz P, van Loo G, et al. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of mouse and human microglia at single-cell resolution. Nature. 2019;566:388–92. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0924-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Masuda T, Sankowski R, Staszewski O, Prinz M. Microglia heterogeneity in the single-cell era. Cell Rep. 2020;30:1271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.01.010. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

-