2013
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information needs of clinicians and non‐clinicians in the Emergency Department: a qualitative study

Abstract: Background: Identifying the information needs of Emergency Department (ED) staff and sources of information that they use can help to improve efficiency and effectiveness in the ED. As Emergency Medicine has unique characteristics, information needs of the Emergency Department (ED) staff might be different from other settings. However, few studies have investigated the information needs of ED staff and the sources of information that they use. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the information needs of ED sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation is thus that the types and/or conceptualisation of format found in academic libraries are not congruent with the LPN workplace. She cites the work of Ayatollahi, Bath and Goodacre (), who found the most common sources used by staff in an emergency department included ‘verbal communication with paramedics, colleagues, patients and relatives; paper‐based records and charts; computer‐based records; and local ED information systems’ (as cited in Dalton, , p. 35). These varied sources are a contrast to the format types often presented in library instruction (scholarly, trade, news and popular) with the aim of encouraging learners to choose peer reviewed research for their written assignments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One explanation is thus that the types and/or conceptualisation of format found in academic libraries are not congruent with the LPN workplace. She cites the work of Ayatollahi, Bath and Goodacre (), who found the most common sources used by staff in an emergency department included ‘verbal communication with paramedics, colleagues, patients and relatives; paper‐based records and charts; computer‐based records; and local ED information systems’ (as cited in Dalton, , p. 35). These varied sources are a contrast to the format types often presented in library instruction (scholarly, trade, news and popular) with the aim of encouraging learners to choose peer reviewed research for their written assignments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although F1 uses text to associate topics to messages, F3, in addition, will automatically describe the contents of images, which can provide a better association of relevant images to speci c inquiries [20]. Using F3 combined with F1 and F2, EPs can save time when searching for information that is not related to their role of treating patients, and may contribute to reduction of non-clinical tasks [21,22].…”
Section: Image Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few studies that do explore information behaviors and technology use in emergency departments focus on the experiences of healthcare practitioners (e.g., Ayatollahi, Bath, & Goodacre, ; Hope & Zhang, ; Johnson et al, ; Reddy & Spence, ). Two studies explored consumer‐related information use in emergency departments; however, these focus on patient education (Joshi, Weng, Lichenstein, Arora, & Sears, ) and information provision (Koonce, Giuse, & Storrow, ), rather than individuals' actual information behaviors during moments of health crisis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
-