Effect of altitude on spirometric parameters and the performance of peak flow meters
- PMID: 8711651
- PMCID: PMC473030
- DOI: 10.1136/thx.51.2.175
Effect of altitude on spirometric parameters and the performance of peak flow meters
Abstract
Background: Portable peak flow meters are used in clinical practice for measurement of peak expiratory flow (PEF) at many different altitudes throughout the world. Some PEF meters are affected by gas density. This study was undertaken to establish which type of meter is best for use above sea level and to determine changes in spirometric measurements at altitude.
Methods: The variable orifice mini-Wright peak flow meter was compared with the fixed orifice Micro Medical Microplus turbine microspirometer at sea level and at Everest Base Camp (5300 m). Fifty one members of the 1994 British Mount Everest Medical Expedition were studied (age range, 19-55).
Results: Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) fell by 5% and PEF rose by 25.5%. However, PEF recorded with the mini-Wright peak flow meter underestimated PEF by 31%, giving readings 6.6% below sea level values. FVC was lowest in the mornings and did not improve significantly with acclimatisation. Lower PEF values were observed on morning readings and were associated with higher acute mountain sickness scores, although the latter may reflect decreased effort in those with acute mountain sickness. There was no change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at altitude when measured with the turbine microspirometer.
Conclusions: The cause of the fall in FVC at 5300 m is unknown but may be attributed to changes in lung blood volume, interstitial lung oedema, or early airways closure. Variable orifice peak flow meters grossly underestimate PEF at altitude and fixed orifice devices are therefore preferable where accurate PEF measurements are required above sea level.
Similar articles
-
Spirometry and respiratory muscle function during ascent to higher altitudes.Lung. 2007 Mar-Apr;185(2):113-21. doi: 10.1007/s00408-006-0108-y. Epub 2007 Mar 28. Lung. 2007. PMID: 17393241 Review.
-
Monitoring of expiratory flow rates and lung volumes during a high altitude expedition.Eur J Med Res. 2005 Nov 16;10(11):469-74. Eur J Med Res. 2005. PMID: 16354600
-
Serial changes in spirometry during an ascent to 5,300 m in the Nepalese Himalayas.High Alt Med Biol. 2000 Fall;1(3):185-95. doi: 10.1089/15270290050144181. High Alt Med Biol. 2000. PMID: 11254228
-
Respiratory function at different altitudes.Respiration. 1997;64(6):416-21. doi: 10.1159/000196717. Respiration. 1997. PMID: 9383816 Review.
-
Hypoxia, hypocapnia and spirometry at altitude.Clin Sci (Lond). 1997 Jun;92(6):593-8. doi: 10.1042/cs0920593. Clin Sci (Lond). 1997. PMID: 9205420
Cited by
-
Unsupervised field-based exercise challenge tests to support the detection of exercise-induced lower airway dysfunction in athletes.BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jul 24;9(3):e001680. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001680. eCollection 2023. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023. PMID: 37520311 Free PMC article.
-
Maximal inspiratory and expiratory flow at moderate altitude: a study of a Latin American population.BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-01943-x. BMC Pulm Med. 2022. PMID: 35439986 Free PMC article.
-
Metabolomic and lipidomic plasma profile changes in human participants ascending to Everest Base Camp.Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 19;9(1):2297. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38832-z. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 30783167 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of thoracic gas compression and airflow density dependence on the assessment of pulmonary function at high altitude.Physiol Rep. 2018 Mar;6(6):e13576. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13576. Physiol Rep. 2018. PMID: 29595881 Free PMC article.
-
The physiological basis and clinical significance of lung volume measurements.Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017 Feb 9;12:3. doi: 10.1186/s40248-017-0084-5. eCollection 2017. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2017. PMID: 28194273 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources