Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors
- PMID: 19019444
- PMCID: PMC3316491
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.051
Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate factors associated with visual field (VF) progression, using all available follow-up through 9 years after treatment initiation, in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS).
Design: Longitudinal follow-up of participants enrolled in a randomized clinical trial.
Participants: Six hundred seven newly diagnosed glaucoma patients.
Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 607 subjects with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma initially were treated with either medication or trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, subjects were evaluated clinically at 6-month intervals. Study participants in both arms of the CIGTS were treated aggressively in an effort to reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) to a level at or below a predetermined, eye-specific target pressure. Visual field progression was analyzed using repeated measures models.
Main outcome measures: Visual field progression, measured by Humphrey 24-2 full-threshold testing and assessed by the change in the mean deviation (MD), and an indicator of substantial worsening of the VF (MD decrease of > or =3 dB from baseline), assessed at each follow-up visit.
Results: Follow-up indicated minimal change from baseline in each initial treatment group's average MD. However, at the 8-year follow-up examination, substantial worsening (> or =3 dB) of MD from baseline was found in 21.3% and 25.5% of the initial surgery and initial medicine groups, respectively. The effect of initial treatment on subsequent VF loss was modified by time (P<0.0001), baseline MD (P = 0.03), and diabetes (P = 0.01). Initial surgery led to less VF progression than initial medicine in subjects with advanced VF loss at baseline, whereas subjects with diabetes had more VF loss over time if treated initially with surgery.
Conclusions: The CIGTS intervention protocol led to a lowering of IOP that persisted over time in both treatment groups. Progression in VF loss was seen in a subset, increasing to more than 20% of the subjects. The findings regarding initial surgery being beneficial for subjects with more advanced VF loss at presentation, but detrimental for patients with diabetes, are noteworthy and warrant independent confirmation.
Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest that pertain to the topic of the manuscript.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Association between Medication Adherence and Visual Field Progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study.Ophthalmology. 2020 Apr;127(4):477-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.10.022. Epub 2020 Jan 10. Ophthalmology. 2020. PMID: 31932093 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Advanced glaucoma at diagnosis: current perspectives.Eye (Lond). 2020 Jan;34(1):116-128. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0637-2. Epub 2019 Nov 18. Eye (Lond). 2020. PMID: 31740802 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medical versus surgical interventions for open angle glaucoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD004399. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004399.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22972069 Review.
-
Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study.Ophthalmology. 2011 Sep;118(9):1766-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.01.047. Epub 2011 May 20. Ophthalmology. 2011. PMID: 21600658 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery.Ophthalmology. 2001 Nov;108(11):1943-53. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(01)00873-9. Ophthalmology. 2001. PMID: 11713061 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Minimally invasive bleb surgery versus minimally invasive glaucoma surgery: a 12-month retrospective study.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 4;14(1):12850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61811-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38834618 Free PMC article.
-
Swiss Multicenter Ab Interno XEN45 Gel Stent Study: 2-Year Real-World Data.Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Jun;13(6):1513-1525. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00917-y. Epub 2024 Apr 6. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024. PMID: 38581605 Free PMC article.
-
Rates of visual field change and functional progression in glaucoma following trabecular microbypass implantation of iStent technologies: a meta-analysis.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 15;9(1):e001575. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001575. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38360043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visual field progression patterns in the ocular hypertension treatment study correspond to vulnerability regions of the disc.Eye (Lond). 2024 Jun;38(8):1549-1555. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-02949-x. Epub 2024 Feb 14. Eye (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38355667 Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma.Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 7;44(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02918-z. Int Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38326580
References
-
- Watson PG, Grierson I. The place of trabeculectomy in the treatment of glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1981;88:175–96. - PubMed
-
- Migdal C, Gregory W, Hitchings R. Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1651–7. - PubMed
-
- The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:429–40. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- EY09143/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- R21 EY018690/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09100/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09140/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09141/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09148/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09150/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- R03 EY015860/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09639/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09142/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- R21 EY018690-02/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09145/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY015860/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09149/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
- EY09144/EY/NEI NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous