Early recovery after remifentanil-pronounced compared with propofol-pronounced total intravenous anaesthesia for short painful procedures
- PMID: 14504162
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg223
Early recovery after remifentanil-pronounced compared with propofol-pronounced total intravenous anaesthesia for short painful procedures
Abstract
Background: We compared recovery from high-dose propofol/low-dose remifentanil ('propofol-pronounced') compared with high-dose remifentanil/low-dose propofol ('remifentanil-pronounced') anaesthesia.
Methods: Adult patients having panendoscopy, microlaryngoscopy, or tonsillectomy were randomly assigned to receive either propofol-pronounced (propofol 100 microg x kg(-1) min(-1); remifentanil 0.15 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) or remifentanil-pronounced (propofol 50 microg x kg(-1) min(-1); remifentanil 0.45 microg x kg(-1) min(-1)) anaesthesia. In both groups, the procedure was started with remifentanil 0.4 microg x kg(-1), propofol 2 mg x kg(-1), and mivacurium 0.2 mg x kg(-1). Cardiovascular measurements and EEG bispectral index (BIS) were recorded. To maintain comparable anaesthetic depth, additional propofol (0.5 mg x kg(-1)) was given if BIS values were greater than 55 and remifentanil (0.4 microg x kg(-1)) if heart rate or arterial pressure was greater than 110% of pre-anaesthetic values.
Results: Patient and surgical characteristics, cardiovascular measurements, and BIS values were similar in both groups. There were no differences in recovery times between the groups (time to extubation: 12.7 (4.5) vs 12.0 (3.6) min, readiness for transfer to the recovery ward: 14.4 (4.4) vs. 13.7 (3.6) min, mean (SD)).
Conclusions: In patients having short painful surgery, less propofol does not give faster recovery as long as the same anaesthetic level (as indicated by BIS and clinical signs) is maintained by more remifentanil. However, recovery times were less variable following remifentanil-pronounced anaesthesia suggesting a more predictable recovery.
Similar articles
-
Surgical pleth index-guided remifentanil administration reduces remifentanil and propofol consumption and shortens recovery times in outpatient anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth. 2013 Apr;110(4):622-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes426. Epub 2012 Dec 5. Br J Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23220856 Clinical Trial.
-
Spectral frequency index monitoring during propofol-remifentanil and propofol-alfentanil total intravenous anaesthesia.CNS Drugs. 2007;21(2):165-71. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200721020-00006. CNS Drugs. 2007. PMID: 17284097 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous techniques in ambulatory anesthesia.Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;21(2):273-88. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8537(02)00081-0. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003. PMID: 12812395 Review.
-
Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Aug;42(7):845-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05332.x. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998. PMID: 9698963 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous anaesthesia: new drugs, new concepts, and clinical applications.Can J Anaesth. 1996 May;43(5 Pt 2):R142-54. doi: 10.1007/BF03011676. Can J Anaesth. 1996. PMID: 8706217 Review. English, French. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 18;10(10):CD007272. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007272.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27755648 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous