Comparison of responses of salivary antioxidant markers to exhaustive aerobic exercise in smoker and non-smoker young girls
- PMID: 26376618
Comparison of responses of salivary antioxidant markers to exhaustive aerobic exercise in smoker and non-smoker young girls
Abstract
Background: Smoking is known as a serious global public health problem, and is also an important risk factor for oral diseases and cause of oxidative stress and cellular damage. Saliva is the first biological medium encountered during inhalation of cigarette smoke. Additionally, previous studies demonstrated that exhaustive aerobic exercise could increase oxidative stress and cellular damage. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to compare the response of salivary antioxidants (peroxides (POX), uric acid (UA), 1-1dipheny l-2-picrylhydrazyl hydrate (DPPH) of exhaustive aerobic exercise between healthy smoker and non-smoker young girls.
Methods: Ten smokers and 10 non-smokers were enrolled for this study. Subjects performed a progressive cycle ergometer with an initial load of 50 W that was increased 50Wevery 3 minutes at the speed of 60rpm, until exhaustion. Un-stimulated saliva samples were collected before, immediately and 1 hour after exercise.
Results: The results showed that POX activity and UA concentration significantly increased immediately after exercise in both groups when compared to the pre exercise values (P<0.01). The level of salivary POX of non-smokers were greater than smokers immediately after exercise (P<0.01). Aerobic exercise caused a decrease in salivary DPPH activity immediately and 1 h after exercise in both groups (P<0.01). When the DPPH values were compared between smoker and non-smoker subjects, a significant decrease was observed in smokers immediately and 1 h after exercise (P<0.01).
Conclusions: In conclusion, aerobic exercise was induced oxidative stress in both groups but oxidative stress in smoking females was greater.
Similar articles
-
Salivary Antioxidants Status Following Progressive Aerobic Exercise: What Are the Differences between Waterpipe Smokers and Non-Smokers?Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;8(10):418. doi: 10.3390/antiox8100418. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31546982 Free PMC article.
-
Salivary Chemical Factors in Relation with Oral Cancer in Smokers and Non-Smokers: a Literature Review.J Dent (Shiraz). 2017 Dec;18(4):237-243. J Dent (Shiraz). 2017. PMID: 29201965 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of salivary antioxidants in healthy smoking and non-smoking men.Chang Gung Med J. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):607-11. Chang Gung Med J. 2011. PMID: 22196063
-
The role of exercise in minimizing postprandial oxidative stress in cigarette smokers.Nicotine Tob Res. 2009 Jan;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntn005. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009. PMID: 19246436 Review.
-
Effects of aerobic exercise on uric acid, total antioxidant activity, oxidative stress, and nitric oxide in human saliva.Res Sports Med. 2008;16(2):128-37. doi: 10.1080/15438620802103700. Res Sports Med. 2008. PMID: 18569946
Cited by
-
Levels of anti-oxidative molecules and inflammatory factors in patients with vascular dementia and their clinical significance.Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):1509-1513. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.5.3854. Pak J Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34475939 Free PMC article.
-
Salivary Redox Biomarkers in Selected Neurodegenerative Diseases.J Clin Med. 2020 Feb 12;9(2):497. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020497. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32059422 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Salivary Antioxidants Status Following Progressive Aerobic Exercise: What Are the Differences between Waterpipe Smokers and Non-Smokers?Antioxidants (Basel). 2019 Sep 20;8(10):418. doi: 10.3390/antiox8100418. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31546982 Free PMC article.
-
The Significance of Lactoperoxidase System in Oral Health: Application and Efficacy in Oral Hygiene Products.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 21;20(6):1443. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061443. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 30901933 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical