Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions
- PMID: 27150317
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8
Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) uses a weak electric current to modulate neuronal activity. A neurophysiologic outcome measure to demonstrate reliable tDCS modulation at the group level is transcranial magnetic stimulation engendered motor evoked potentials (MEPs). Here, we conduct a study testing the reliability of individual MEP response patterns following a common tDCS protocol. Fourteen participants (7m/7f) each underwent nine randomized sessions of 1 mA, 10 min tDCS (3 anode; 3 cathode; 3 sham) delivered using an M1/orbito-frontal electrode montage (sessions separated by an average of ~5.5 days). Fifteen MEPs were obtained prior to, immediately following and in 5 min intervals for 30 min following tDCS. TMS was delivered at 130 % resting motor threshold using neuronavigation to ensure consistent coil localization. A number of non-experimental variables were collected during each session. At the individual level, considerable variability was seen among different testing sessions. No participant demonstrated an excitatory response ≥20 % to all three anodal sessions, and no participant demonstrated an inhibitory response ≥20 % to all three cathodal sessions. Intra-class correlation revealed poor anodal and cathodal test-retest reliability [anode: ICC(2,1) = 0.062; cathode: ICC(2,1) = 0.055] and moderate sham test-retest reliability [ICC(2,1) = 0.433]. Results also revealed no significant effect of tDCS at the group level. Using this common protocol, we found the effects of tDCS on MEP amplitudes to be highly variable at the individual level. In addition, no significant effects of tDCS on MEP amplitude were found at the group level. Future studies should consider utilizing a more strict experimental protocol to potentially account for intra-individual response variations.
Keywords: Longitudinal; Motor evoked potentials (MEPs); Reliability; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Similar articles
-
Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.Neurophysiol Clin. 2018 Apr;48(2):77-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Dec 13. Neurophysiol Clin. 2018. PMID: 29248201
-
The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;6(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28264713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Brain Stimul. 2016. PMID: 27387569
-
Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.Brain Stimul. 2015 Nov-Dec;8(6):1130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.07.031. Epub 2015 Jul 23. Brain Stimul. 2015. PMID: 26294061 Clinical Trial.
-
Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review.Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;66:213-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.021. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Neuropsychologia. 2015. PMID: 25448853 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation on multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of randomized clinical trials.Mol Psychiatry. 2024 May 30. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02624-3. Online ahead of print. Mol Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38816583 Review.
-
Placebo effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor skill acquisition.Neurosci Lett. 2023 Sep 25;814:137442. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137442. Epub 2023 Aug 15. Neurosci Lett. 2023. PMID: 37591359 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jan 12;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01129-4. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36635693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Investigation of Neuromodulatory Effect of Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Cerebellum. 2024 Feb;23(1):56-66. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01511-x. Epub 2023 Jan 12. Cerebellum. 2024. PMID: 36633829
-
Effects of Preceding Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Movement Velocity and EMG Signal during the Back Squat Exercise.J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 3;11(17):5220. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175220. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36079150 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources