Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
- PMID: 27387569
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Abstract
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a popular non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has been shown to influence cortical excitability. While polarity specific effects have often been reported, this is not always the case, and variability in both the magnitude and direction of the effects have been observed.
Objective/hypothesis: We aimed to explore the consistency and reliability of the effects of tDCS by investigating changes in cortical excitability across multiple testing sessions in the same individuals. A within subjects design was used to investigate the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS applied to the motor cortex. Four experimental sessions were tested for each polarity in addition to two sham sessions.
Methods: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure cortical excitability (TMS recruitment curves). Changes in excitability were measured by comparing baseline measures and those taken immediately following 20 minutes of 2 mA stimulation or sham stimulation.
Results: Anodal tDCS significantly increased cortical excitability at a group level, whereas cathodal tDCS failed to have any significant effects. The sham condition also failed to show any significant changes. Analysis of intra-subject responses to anodal stimulation across four sessions suggest that the amount of change in excitability across sessions was only weakly associated, and was found to have poor reliability across sessions (ICC = 0.276). The effects of cathodal stimulation show even poorer reliability across sessions (ICC = 0.137). In contrast ICC analysis for the two sessions of sham stimulation reflect a moderate level of reliability (ICC = .424).
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that although 2 mA anodal tDCS is effective at increasing cortical excitability at group level, the effects are unreliable across repeated testing sessions within individual participants. Our results suggest that 2 mA cathodal tDCS does not significantly alter cortical excitability immediately following stimulation and that there is poor reliability of the effect within the same individual across different testing sessions.
Keywords: Cortical excitability; Motor cortex; Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Similar articles
-
Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Rev Neurosci. 2018 Feb 23;29(2):223-232. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0026. Rev Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 28889119 Review.
-
Response variability of different anodal transcranial direct current stimulation intensities across multiple sessions.Brain Stimul. 2017 Jul-Aug;10(4):757-763. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 10. Brain Stimul. 2017. PMID: 28420581 Free PMC article.
-
The number of stimuli required to reliably assess corticomotor excitability and primary motor cortical representations using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): a systematic review and meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 6;6(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0440-8. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28264713 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation.J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1273-1288. doi: 10.1113/JP272738. Epub 2016 Nov 8. J Physiol. 2017. PMID: 27723104 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.Exp Brain Res. 2016 Sep;234(9):2629-42. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4667-8. Epub 2016 May 5. Exp Brain Res. 2016. PMID: 27150317
Cited by
-
Right frontal HD-tDCS reveals causal involvement of time perception networks in temporal processing of concepts.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 3;13(1):16658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43416-z. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37789056 Free PMC article.
-
Individual Differences in Decision Strategy Relate to Neurochemical Excitability and Cortical Thickness.J Neurosci. 2023 Oct 18;43(42):7006-7015. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1086-23.2023. Epub 2023 Sep 1. J Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37657932 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances early dexterity skills with the left non-dominant hand: a randomized controlled trial.J Transl Med. 2023 Feb 24;21(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-03989-9. J Transl Med. 2023. PMID: 36823635 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Investigation of Neuromodulatory Effect of Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Cerebellum. 2024 Feb;23(1):56-66. doi: 10.1007/s12311-023-01511-x. Epub 2023 Jan 12. Cerebellum. 2024. PMID: 36633829
-
A New Non-invasive Neuromodulation Technique for Super Refractory Status Epilepticus: Can We Consider tDCS for This Devastating Condition?Neurotherapeutics. 2023 Jan;20(1):179-180. doi: 10.1007/s13311-022-01329-1. Epub 2022 Dec 9. Neurotherapeutics. 2023. PMID: 36484907 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources