Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation
- PMID: 27723104
- PMCID: PMC5309387
- DOI: 10.1113/JP272738
Systematic evaluation of the impact of stimulation intensity on neuroplastic after-effects induced by transcranial direct current stimulation
Abstract
Key points: Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate human neuroplasticity have increased in research and clinical settings. However, the need for longer-lasting effects, combined with marked inter-individual variability, necessitates a deeper understanding of the relationship between stimulation parameters and physiological effects. We systematically investigated the full DC intensity range (0.5-2.0 mA) for both anodal and cathodal tDCS in a sham-controlled repeated measures design, monitoring changes in motor-cortical excitability via transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 2 h after stimulation. For both tDCS polarities, the excitability after-effects did not linearly correlate with increasing DC intensity; effects of lower intensities (0.5, 1.0 mA) showed equal, if not greater effects in motor-cortical excitability. Further, while intra-individual responses showed good reliability, inter-individual sensitivity to TMS accounted for a modest percentage of the variance in the early after-effects of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS, which may be of practical relevance for future optimizations.
Abstract: Contemporary non-invasive neuromodulatory techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have shown promising potential in both restituting impairments in cortical physiology in clinical settings, as well as modulating cognitive abilities in the healthy population. However, neuroplastic after-effects of tDCS are highly dependent on stimulation parameters, relatively short lasting, and not expectedly uniform between individuals. The present study systematically investigates the full range of current intensity between 0.5 and 2.0 mA on left primary motor cortex (M1) plasticity, as well as the impact of individual-level covariates on explaining inter-individual variability. Thirty-eight healthy subjects were divided into groups of anodal and cathodal tDCS. Five DC intensities (sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mA) were investigated in separate sessions. Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), 25 motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded before, and 10 time points up to 2 h following 15 min of tDCS. Repeated-measures ANOVAs indicated a main effect of intensity for both anodal and cathodal tDCS. With anodal tDCS, all active intensities resulted in equivalent facilitatory effects relative to sham while for cathodal tDCS, only 1.0 mA resulted in sustained excitability diminution. An additional experiment conducted to assess intra-individual variability revealed generally good reliability of 1.0 mA anodal tDCS (ICC(2,1) = 0.74 over the first 30 min). A post hoc analysis to discern sources of inter-individual variability confirmed a previous finding in which individual TMS SI1mV (stimulus intensity for 1 mV MEP amplitude) sensitivity correlated negatively with 1.0 mA anodal tDCS effects on excitability. Our study thus provides further insights on the extent of non-linear intensity-dependent neuroplastic after-effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS.
Keywords: neuromodulation; neurophysiology; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; variability.
© 2016 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2016 The Physiological Society.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g001.gif)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g002.gif)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g003.gif)
![Figure 4](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g004.gif)
![Figure 5](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g005.gif)
![Figure 6](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g006.gif)
![Figure 7](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/5309387/bin/TJP-595-1273-g007.gif)
Comment in
-
Exploratory studies: a crucial step towards better hypothesis-driven confirmatory research in brain stimulation.J Physiol. 2017 Feb 15;595(4):1013-1014. doi: 10.1113/JP273582. Epub 2017 Jan 17. J Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28095638 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Dose dependency of transcranial direct current stimulation: implications for neuroplasticity induction in health and disease.J Physiol. 2017 Jun 1;595(11):3265-3266. doi: 10.1113/JP274089. Epub 2017 Mar 10. J Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28188627 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Non-linear changes to corticospinal excitability induced with increasing intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation.J Physiol. 2017 Mar 1;595(5):1445-1446. doi: 10.1113/JP273811. J Physiol. 2017. PMID: 28247511 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation improves heart rate variability: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 24;134:111072. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111072. Online ahead of print. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38925337 Review.
-
A Review of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined with Medication and Psychotherapy for Depression.Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2024 May-Jun 01;32(3):77-95. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000396. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38728568 Review.
-
Current intensity- and polarity-specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Apr 15;41(6):1644-1666. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24901. Epub 2019 Dec 20. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 31860160 Free PMC article.
-
Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2016 Nov-Dec;9(6):819-825. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.052. Epub 2016 Jun 21. Brain Stimul. 2016. PMID: 27387569
-
Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans.J Physiol. 2013 Apr 1;591(7):1987-2000. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.249730. Epub 2013 Jan 21. J Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23339180 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Temporal Dynamics of Adverse Effects across Five Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.Brain Sci. 2024 Apr 30;14(5):457. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14050457. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38790436 Free PMC article.
-
The Application of tDCS to Treat Pain and Psychocognitive Symptoms in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.Neural Plast. 2024 Apr 13;2024:6344925. doi: 10.1155/2024/6344925. eCollection 2024. Neural Plast. 2024. PMID: 38645612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurochemical Predictors of Generalized Learning Induced by Brain Stimulation and Training.J Neurosci. 2024 May 22;44(21):e1676232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1676-23.2024. J Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 38531634
-
Small effects of electric field on motor cortical excitability following anodal tDCS.iScience. 2024 Feb 1;27(2):108967. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108967. eCollection 2024 Feb 16. iScience. 2024. PMID: 38352229 Free PMC article.
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms of long COVID.Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52763-4. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38272997 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Ambrus GG, Al‐Moyed H, Chaieb L, Sarp L, Antal A & Paulus W (2012). The fade‐in – short stimulation – fade out approach to sham tDCS – reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimul 5, 499–504. - PubMed
-
- Ambrus GG, Paulus W & Antal A (2010). Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: Comparison of tDCS and tRNS. Clin Neurophysiol 121, 1908–1914. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources