Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;64(4):845-849.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05377-0. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Dose-response relationship between genetically proxied average blood glucose levels and incident coronary heart disease in individuals without diabetes mellitus

Affiliations

Dose-response relationship between genetically proxied average blood glucose levels and incident coronary heart disease in individuals without diabetes mellitus

Stephen Burgess et al. Diabetologia. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Our aim was to investigate the relationship between average blood glucose levels and incident CHD in individuals without diabetes mellitus.

Methods: To investigate average blood glucose levels, we studied HbA1c as predicted by 40 variants previously shown to be associated with both type 2 diabetes and HbA1c. Linear and non-linear Mendelian randomisation analyses were performed to investigate associations with incident CHD risk in 324,830 European ancestry individuals from the UK Biobank without diabetes mellitus.

Results: Every one mmol/mol increase in genetically proxied HbA1c was associated with an 11% higher CHD risk (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05, 1.18). The dose-response curve increased at all levels of HbA1c, and there was no evidence favouring a non-linear relationship over a linear one.

Conclusions/interpretations: In individuals without diabetes mellitus, lowering average blood glucose levels may reduce CHD risk in a dose-dependent way.

Keywords: Average blood glucose levels; CHD; Mendelian randomisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Non-linear Mendelian randomisation investigating the relationship between genetically proxied average blood glucose levels (measured by HbA1c) and risk of incident CHD in individuals without diabetes mellitus: (a) men and women combined; (b) men only; and (c) women only. The x-axis depicts HbA1c levels in mmol/mol. The y-axis depicts the hazard ratio for coronary heart disease (HR for CHD) with respect to the reference, plotted on a log scale. Reference is set to an HbA1c of 30 mmol/mol (4.9%). The grey lines represent the 95% CIs. The fractional polynomial test is a goodness-of-fit test that assesses whether any improvement of fit when using a non-linear function to model the association, compared with a linear function, is greater than would be expected due to chance (a significant p value indicates that a non-linear model is preferred to a linear model)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roth GA, Johnson C, Abajobir A, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(1):1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.04.052. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levitan EB, Song Y, Ford ES, et al. Is nondiabetic hyperglycemia a risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(19):2147–2155. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.19.2147. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vujkovic M, Keaton JM, Lynch JA, et al. Discovery of 318 new risk loci for type 2 diabetes and related vascular outcomes among 1.4 million participants in a multi-ancestry meta-analysis. Nat Genet. 2020;52(7):680–691. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0637-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wheeler E, Leong A, Liu CT, et al. Impact of common genetic determinants of hemoglobin A1c on type 2 diabetes risk and diagnosis in ancestrally diverse populations: a transethnic genome-wide meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(9):e1002383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002383. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgess S, Dudbridge F, Thompson SG. Combining information on multiple instrumental variables in Mendelian randomization: comparison of allele score and summarized data methods. Stat Med. 2016;35(11):1880–1906. doi: 10.1002/sim.6835. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-