Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 20;20(1):111.
doi: 10.1186/s12944-021-01525-6.

Validation of multiple equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults

Affiliations

Validation of multiple equations for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in Korean adults

Rihwa Choi et al. Lipids Health Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Limited data are available for validation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) calculation (LDLcal) in the adult Korean population. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new equation for LDLcal and to compare it with previous such equations in a Korean population.

Methods: A new equation for LDLcal was developed (LDLChoi). LDLChoi and 11 other previously published equations were applied and compared with directly measured LDL concentration (LDLdirect) in a development cohort (population 1), an independent validation cohort in the same laboratory (population 2), and the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017 cohort (population 3).

Results: Among the 12 equations, the newly-developed equation (LDLChoi = total cholesterol - 0.87 x high-density lipoprotein cholesterol - 0.13 x triglycerides) had the highest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the lowest mean systemic difference and median absolute percentage error in populations 1 and 2 but not in population 3. Subgroup analysis showed good agreement between LDLChoi and LDLdirect (ICC > 0.75) in population 2, whose LDLdirect < 70 mg/dL. For samples with high triglycerides (> 400 mg/dL), equation accuracy varied. Categorization concordance according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria with the other 11 equations were less than 80%; that of LDLChoi was 87.6 and 87.4% in populations 1 and 2, respectively.

Conclusions: Accuracy of 12 equations for LDLcal varied by cohort and subgroup based on LDLdirect and triglycerides. A laboratory-specific equation for LDLcal and/or LDLdirect may be needed for accurate evaluation of LDL status.

Keywords: Calculated low-density lipoprotein; Friedwald equation; Korea; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Martin/Hopkins equation; National Cholesterol Education Program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study scheme
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bland–Altman plots for nine equations with directly measured LDL concentration (excluding LDLRao, LDLAhmadi, and LDLde Cordova equations). X-axis represents directly measured LDL concentration (LDLdirect) and Y axis represents difference between calculated LDL and directly measured LDL (LDLdirect)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Overall agreement of categorization according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) between calculated LDL and directly measured LDL. X-axis represents percentage of agreement. Red color represents underestimated, yellow color represents concordant, and green color represents overestimated patient categories according to NCEP ATP III in comparison with those categories assigned by directly measured LDL concentration

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Langlois MR, Chapman MJ, Cobbaert C, Mora S, Remaley AT, Ros E, Watts GF, Boren J, Baum H, Bruckert E, et al. Quantifying Atherogenic lipoproteins: current and future challenges in the era of personalized medicine and very low concentrations of LDL cholesterol. A consensus Statement from EAS and EFLM. Clin Chem. 2018;64(7):1006–1033. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.287037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gragnano F, Calabrò P. Role of dual lipid-lowering therapy in coronary atherosclerosis regression: evidence from recent studies. Atherosclerosis. 2018;269:219–228. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin SS, Giugliano RP, Murphy SA, Wasserman SM, Stein EA, Ceska R, Lopez-Miranda J, Georgiev B, Lorenzatti AJ, Tikkanen MJ, et al. Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assessment by Martin/Hopkins estimation, Friedewald estimation, and preparative ultracentrifugation: insights from the FOURIER trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2018;3(8):749–753. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1533. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Toth PP, Kwiterovich PO, Blumenthal RS, Jones SR. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile. Jama. 2013;310(19):2061–2068. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280532. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller WG, Myers GL, Sakurabayashi I, Bachmann LM, Caudill SP, Dziekonski A, Edwards S, Kimberly MM, Korzun WJ, Leary ET, Nakajima K, Nakamura M, Nilsson G̈, Shamburek RD, Vetrovec GW, Warnick GR, Remaley AT. Seven direct methods for measuring HDL and LDL cholesterol compared with ultracentrifugation reference measurement procedures. Clin Chem. 2010;56(6):977–986. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.142810. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

-