Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Jul;32(7):1281-1289.
doi: 10.1002/oby.24044.

Isocaloric replacement of ultraprocessed foods was associated with greater weight loss in the POUNDS Lost trial

Qisi Yao  1 , Carolina D de Araujo  1 , Filippa Juul  2 , Catherine M Champagne  3 , George A Bray  3 , Frank M Sacks  4   5   6 , Maya K Vadiveloo  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Isocaloric replacement of ultraprocessed foods was associated with greater weight loss in the POUNDS Lost trial

Qisi Yao et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Higher intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs) is associated with obesity. We examined whether replacing UPFs (NOVA 4) with minimally processed foods and culinary ingredients (NOVA 1 + 2) was associated with differential weight change in this secondary prospective analysis of the Preventing Overweight Using Novel Dietary Strategies (POUNDS) Lost trial.

Methods: We estimated percent energy intake (%kcal) from the four NOVA groups using 24-h dietary recalls in a subset of 356 participants. Multivariable-adjusted substitution models examined whether replacing %kcal from UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with greater weight, body fat percentage, trunk fat, and waist circumference reduction at 6 months; changes in parameters were compared among NOVA 1 + 2 tertiles (T).

Results: Participants were on average 52.3 years of age, 85% White, 55% female, and 58.2% nonsmoking, with a mean BMI of 32.7 kg/m2. Replacing 10%kcal of UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with greater 6-month weight (ß = 0.51, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.09, p = 0.02), body fat percentage (ß = 2.7, 95% CI: -5.10 to -0.43, p = 0.02), and trunk fat reduction (ß = 3.9, 95% CI: -7.01 to -0.70, p = 0.02), but not waist circumference reduction. Participants in T3 (-8.33 kg) versus T1 (-5.32 kg) of NOVA 1 + 2 had greater weight loss (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Isocaloric substitution of UPFs with NOVA 1 + 2 was associated with marginally greater weight loss under energy restriction. These modest findings support more research exploring the mechanisms linking UPFs with body weight regulation beyond energy intake.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Obes Rev. 2013 Nov;14 Suppl 2:21-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2440-2450 - PubMed
    1. Nutrients. 2021 Mar 18;13(3): - PubMed
    1. Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):346-347 - PubMed
    1. Front Nutr. 2019 May 28;6:70 - PubMed

Publication types

-