Skip to main content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 30; 101(13): 4346–4351.
Published online 2004 Mar 22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400368101
PMCID: PMC384749
PMID: 15070720

The structure of zetekitoxin AB, a saxitoxin analog from the Panamanian golden frog Atelopus zeteki: A potent sodium-channel blocker

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Abstract

Bufonid anurans of the genus Atelopus contain both steroidal bufadienolides and various guanidinium alkaloids of the tetrodotoxin class. The former inhibit sodium-potassium ATPases, whereas the latter block voltage-dependent sodium channels. The structure of one guanidinium alkaloid, zetekitoxin AB, has remained a mystery for over 30 years. The structure of this alkaloid now has been investigated with a sample of ≈0.3 mg, purified from extracts obtained decades ago from the Panamanian golden frog Atelopus zeteki. Detailed NMR and mass spectral analyses have provided the structure and relative stereochemistry of zetekitoxin AB and have revealed that it is an analog of saxitoxin. The proposed structure is characterized by richness of heteroatoms (C16H25N8O12S) and contains a unique 1,2-oxazolidine ring-fused lactam, a sulfate ester, and an N-hydroxycarbamate moiety. Zetekitoxin AB proved to be an extremely potent blocker of voltage-dependent sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The IC50 values were 280 pM for human heart channels, 6.1 pM for rat brain IIa channels, and 65 pM for rat skeletal muscle channels, thus being roughly 580-, 160-, and 63-fold more potent at these channels than saxitoxin.

Brightly colored bufonid anurans of the genus Atelopus found in Central and South America were known to have poisonous skin secretions since the late 1800s (see ref. 1 and references therein). In 1969, Mosher and colleagues reported the presence of a potent, water-soluble, guanidinium toxin in extracts of skin of Atelopus zeteki, which they designated atelopidtoxin (1, 2). Later in 1975, they identified another guanidinium toxin, tetrodotoxin, as the major alkaloid in aqueous skin extracts of Costa Rican Atelopus varius, whereas a similar guanidinium toxin, chiriquitoxin, was found as the major alkaloid in Costa Rican Atelopus chiriquiensis (3). The structure of chiriquitoxin finally was determined in 1990 (4). The third guanidinium toxin, atelopidtoxin, was the major alkaloid in the Panamanian golden frog A. zeteki (3). It was renamed zetekitoxin to indicate a unique occurrence in A. zeteki. Subsequent studies did not reveal the structure of the major toxic component zetekitoxin AB (LD50 i.p. mouse, 11 μg/kg) nor of the minor component zetekitoxin C (LD50 i.p. mouse, 80 μg/kg; ref. 5). Indications existed that zetekitoxin AB was a mixture of two similar compounds and, hence, the designation AB. In these early studies, zetekitoxins were chemically and pharmacologically distinguished from tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin (13, 5). Studies on zetekitoxins were interrupted, in part, because of designation of the frog as an endangered species, and the structures remained a mystery for >30 years. Tetrodotoxin, but not chiriquitoxin nor zetekitoxin, was subsequently found in other Atelopus species and in other amphibians (refs. 610 and references therein). Toxic steroidal bufadienolides also are present in skin of anurans of the genus Atelopus, including A. zeteki (11). The structure of zetekitoxin AB has now been determined. Purification of ≈0.3 mg from frogs, collected before restrictions, and spectral analysis showed that zetekitoxin AB (Fig. 1, 1) is a saxitoxin analog with an unprecedented 1,2-oxazolidine ring-fused lactam moiety. The inhibitory effects of zetekitoxin AB on voltage-dependent sodium channels expressed in Xenopus oocytes indicate that zetekitoxin AB is an extremely potent sodium channel blocker, manyfold more potent than saxitoxin, but with a similar profile of activity at sodium channel isoforms.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zpq0130443310001.jpg

Proposed structure of zetekitoxin AB (1) and an energy-minimized conformation, determined by molecular modeling, together with the structure of saxitoxin (2), and an excluded alternative structure (3) for zetekitoxin AB.

Methods

Materials. The skins of frogs (50 skins, 10 g wet weight), presumably A. zeteki, collected near El Cope, Coclé, Panamá in October 1971, were kept in MeOH at –20°C until 1986. Recent mDNA data suggest that this population of frogs actually may represent a population of A. varius, whereas the population from El Valle studied by Fuhrman et al. (1) and other populations to the east of El Valle represent true A. zeteki (A. Wisnieski, personal communication). Saxitoxin was purified from the mollusc Spondylus butleri (12). For electrophysiological studies, saxitoxin was obtained from Calbiochem, Sigma, or the Marine Analytical Chemistry Standards Program of the Institute of Marine Biosciences, National Research Council of Canada (Halifax, Canada). STX from the various sources showed equivalent activities.

Purification of Zetekitoxin AB. Zetekitoxin AB was purified from the skin of A. zeteki guided by mouse bioassay (cf., ref. 5). In 1986, the skin of frogs was homogenized and extracted with H2O and then with acetic acid/H2O (2:98), and the homogenate was dialyzed (30,000 Mr cutoff) against H2O. The dialysate was concentrated by evaporation and ultrafiltered with a 10,000 Mr cutoff membrane. The filtrate was concentrated by lyophilization and dissolved in 1 ml of H2O to be applied to a gel filtration column, Bio-Gel P-2 (1.2 × 50 cm; Bio-Rad), equilibrated with pyridine/acetic acid/H2O (24:2:974, pH 6.2). The column was eluted with this solution at 1 ml/min, and the eluted toxic fraction was applied to another gel filtration column, TSK-gel G2000PW (0.75 × 30 cm; Tosoh, Tokyo) with 0.05 M acetic acid at 0.5 ml/min. The most toxic fraction (eluate at 10.2–11.1 ml) represented zetekitoxin AB. After confirmation of the purity in 1986 by TLC and 1H NMR analysis, the fraction containing zetekitoxin AB (≈0.3 mg) was lyophilized and kept at –80°C until further analysis in 1999. Quantification was by 1H NMR.

General Chemical Methods. All reagents were special grade. TLC was carried out with Merck Silica Gel 60 plates (Darmstadt, Germany). The Fourier transform IR spectrum was measured with an Impact 410 spectrometer (Nicolet) on a Zn/Se plate. High-resolution electrospray-ionization/time-of-flight (ESI/TOF) MS was performed in positive ion mode with a Mariner mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems). ESI triple-quadrupole MS was performed in positive and negative ion modes with a TSQ700 mass spectrometer (Finnigan-MAT, San Jose, CA). An ESI collision-induced dissociation (CID) MS/MS experiment was carried out in positive and negative ion modes with a Micromass quadruple time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-TOF, Micromass, Manchester, U.K.). The following NMR spectra of zetekitoxin AB (0.5 μmol) were measured with an Inova 600 spectrometer (600 MHz, Varian) by using 5-mm-i.d. probe (Varian) in 0.4 ml of CD3COOD/D2O (4:96) at 20°C or 35°C as noted and referenced to internal CHD2COOD (δ 2.06) and 13CD3COOD (δ 22.4) (multiplicities, J values in Hz, and assignments are in parentheses). (i) Double-quantum correlation spectroscopy, total correlation spectroscopy with a 100-msec mixing time and data matrices of 2,048 × 256, nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) spectroscopy and rotating frame NOE spectroscopy with 200-msec mixing time and data matrices of 2,048 × 128 (the signal of DHO is irradiated for suppression). (ii) Single irradiation NOE difference spectra. (iii) Gradient heteronuclear single-quantum correlations, with data matrices of 1,024 × 256 for 48 h. (iv) 13C-1H gradient heteronuclear multiple-bond correlations (HMBC) (JCH = 8 Hz) with data matrices of 1,024 × 128 and 13C column width for 25,974 Hz and for 6,000 Hz for 65 h. (v) 15N-1H gradient HMBC (JNH = 8 Hz) with data matrices of 1,024 × 32 and 15N column width for 12,160 Hz for 120 h. The 15N signal of benzamide (at 106 ppm) was used as the external reference. (vi) The 13C NMR spectra were measured by using a 5-mm SW probe (Nalorac, Martinez, CA) (a total of 1.5 × 105 acquisitions in 84 h) in CD3COOD/D2O (4:96) and in CD3COOD/D2O/H2O (4:6:90). Molecular modeling was performed with macspartan plus 1.2.2 software (Wavefunction, Irvine, CA). Energy minimization was performed by molecular mechanics calculation (13) with SYBYL force field (14).

NMR Data of Saxitoxin (2). 13C NMR, 13C-1H, and 15N-1H gradient HMBC spectra of 2 (43 μmol in 0.4 ml of CD3COOD/D2O, 4:96) at 20°C were measured under the same conditions as those for zetekitoxin AB. 2: 13C NMR (150 MHz, 13CD3COOD at 22.4): δ 33.3 (C11, after deuterium exchanged from the HMBC), 43.4 (C10), 53.8 (C6), 57.7 (C5), 63.9 (C13), 83.2 (C4), 99.2 (C12), 156.8 (C2), 158.7 (C8), 159.7 (C14); 15N NMR (60.8 MHz, partial with 15N of benzamide at 106 ppm as external reference). From the HMBC of N1/H5, N1/H13a, N1/H13b, N3/H5, N3/H10α, N3/H10β, and N7/H6 the following δN were determined: δ 81 (N1), 103 (N3), and 88 (N7).

Preparation of the Model Compounds for ESI MS/MS (6 and 8). N-Hydroxycarbamic acid 1,3-dioxo-1,3-dihydro-isoindol-2-ylmethyl ester (6) was prepared by treatment of N-hydroxymethyl phthalimide with N,N′-carbonyldiimidazole in dry acetonitrile and then with hydroxylamine hydrochloride in dry pyridine (15). High-resolution ESI/TOF-MS (MeOH): [M + Na]+ m/z 259.0360, calcd for [C10H8N2O5Na]+ m/z 259.0331. Fourier transform IR (thin film) νmax 3159, 2962, 2848, 1780, 1728, 1373, 1201, 1093, 699 cm–1; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3OD, 20°C, CHD2OD at δ 3.30): δ 5.70 (2H, s, CH2), 7.86 (2H, dd, J = 5.3, 3.1, aromatic), 7.92 (2H, dd, J = 5.3, 3.1, aromatic). 13C NMR (150 MHz, CD3OD, 13CD3OD at 49.8 ppm, 35°C): δ 62.9 (CH2), 125.8, 137.0 (aromatic CH), 133.9 (aromatic quaternary), 159.8 (carbamate C = O), 169.3 (imide C = O). A formaldehyde adduct (8) was prepared from 2-imino-1-imidazolidineacetic acid with formaldehyde by stirring for 48 h at room temperature. A part of resulting mixture was diluted with MeOH or D2O and used in spectral analysis. High-resolution ESI/TOF-MS: [M + H]+ m/z 174.0855, calcd for [C6H12N3O3]+ m/z 174.0879. 1H NMR (600 MHz, D2O, 20°C, HDO at 4.85) δ 3.75 (2H, dd, J = 10.2, 6.6, CH2–N(CH2COOH)–), 3.83 (2H, dd, J = 10.2, 6.6, CH2–N(CH2OH)–), 3.93 (2H, s, CH2–COOH), 4.85 (2H, s, N–CH2–OH). 13C NMR (150 MHz, D2O, 35°C, 13CD3COOD as external reference at 22.4 ppm). From the HMBC and heteronuclear single-quantum correlations the following δc values were determined: δ 45 (CH2–N(CH2OH)–), 47 (CH2–N(COOH)–), 48 (N–CH2–COOH), 68 (N–CH2–OH), 159 (guanidinium), 176 (COOH).

Electrophysiology. Xenopus laevis oocytes were isolated and injected with 20–50 nl of in vitro-transcribed sodium channel cRNA by using techniques as described (16, 17). Oocytes were studied 48–72 h after injection at room temperature (20–22°C) in a flowing-bath chamber. Transmembrane currents were measured by using a two-electrode oocyte voltage-clamp (model CA1B, Dagan Instruments, Minneapolis), A/D converter (1320A, Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) and data acquisition software (axograph 4.4, Axon Instruments) from oocytes expressing 1–4 μA of current. Sodium channel currents were elicited by applying a single 70-ms step depolarization protocol to 0 mV from –100 mV. Each step was separated by 20 s to allow for complete channel recovery. Toxin stock solutions were added to the bath solution, which consisted of 90 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM Hepes titrated to pH 7.2 with 1 N NaOH immediately before each experiment. The IC50 values for toxin were calculated from the ratio of peak currents in the absence and presence of toxin, based on a single-site Langmuir adsorption isotherm at steady state or from the ratio of the toxin on-and-off rates. Results were comparable by each technique. Toxin activity was constant over the course of the experiment.

Results

Characterization of Zetekitoxin AB. Zetekitoxin AB (1) showed the following physical and spectral characteristics. TLC: Silica Gel 60, pyridine/ethyl acetate/acetic acid/H2O, 15:7:3:6, Rf 0.57 [saxitoxin (2): Rf 0.36]; yellow fluorescent spots under UV light (365 nm) after heating with H2O2/H2O (1:99) and 1 N NaOH/H2O. IR (Zn-Se plate): νmax1702 (shoulder), 1672 (shoulder), 1572, 1561, 1421, 1338, 1268, 1051, 1022 cm–1. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CD3COOD/D2O 4:96, CHD2COOD at δ 2.06, 35°C): δ 2.19 (d, 16.2, H14α), 2.23 (m, H16), 2.80 (dd, 7.8, 16.2, H14β), 3.64 (dd, 7.2, 12.0, H18a), 3.75 (dd, 4.2, 12.0, H18b), 3.78 (d, 12.6, H10α), 3.98 (s, H6), 3.98 (d, 10.8, H19a), 4.04 (t, 7.8, H15), 4.25 (br s, H17a), 4.26 (br s, H17b), 4.42 (d, 12.6, H10β), 5.05 (d, 10.8, H19b), 5.11 (s, H5); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CD3COOD/D2O 4:96, 20°C, 13CD3COOD at 22.4 ppm): δ 34.3 (C14), 46.9 (C16), 53.7 (C15), 55.3 (C10), 55.6 (C6), 61.7 (C18), 61.9 (C5), 68.9 (C17), 69.9 (C19), 86.4 (C4), 89.4 (C11), 97.4 (C12), 155.8, 156.5 (C2, C13, interchangeable), 158.7 (C8), 159.2 (C20); 15N NMR (60.8 MHz, CD3COOD/D2O 4:96, 20°C, with 15N of benzamide at 106 ppm as external reference). From the HMBC of N1/H5, N7/H6, and N7/H19b the following δN values were determined: δ 84 (N1) and 86 (N7) (see Fig. 5, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site).

Structure Elucidation of Zetekitoxin AB (1). Zetekitoxin AB, purified to TLC homogeneity in 1986, now was shown to consist of an approximate 3:1 mixture of two closely related components by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 2). The structure of the major component was analyzed. The minor component may be the des-sulfate. The 1H NMR spectrum of zetekitoxin AB and its LD50 (10 μg/kg i.p. mouse) measured in 1999 were consistent with those measured in 1986.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zpq0130443310002.jpg

The 600 MHz 13C-1H gradient HMBC spectra for zetekitoxin AB (0.5 μmol) with 1H and 13C NMR spectra and signal assignments (0.4 ml of CD3COOD/D2O, 4:96, 20°C, JCH = 8 Hz, 13C column width for 25,974 Hz). (Inset) 13C column width for 6,000 Hz (partial). The gradient HMBC spectra for saxitoxin are in Figs. 6 and 7, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.

The chemical structure of zetekitoxin AB (1) was elucidated based on NMR spectroscopy and mass spectral data. The molecular ions of zetekitoxin AB appeared at m/z of 553 [M + H]+ in the positive ion mode, and at m/z of 551 [M – H] in the negative ion mode of ESI/TOF-MS. There was also an ion at m/z 473 [M – SO3 + H]+ in the positive ion mode. High-resolution ESI/TOF-MS analysis of the m/z 553 [M + H]+ peak showed that the exact mass was at m/z 553.1326, corresponding to a formula of C16H25N8O12S (calculated mass, m/z 553.1313), and that of the m/z 473 [M – SO3 + H]+ peak showed that the exact mass was at m/z 473.1725, corresponding to a formula of C16H25N8O9 (calculated mass, m/z 473.1744). The presence of an O- or N-sulfate group in zetekitoxin AB was supported by the prominent fragment ion at m/z 473 [M – SO3 + H]+ on a CID ESI-MS/MS spectrum measured by choosing the ion at m/z 553 as the precursor ion (Fig. 3A) and also by the IR band at 1,268 cm–1. Existence of 10 exchangeable protons in zetekitoxin AB was indicated by the [M – 11H + 11D]+ ion (m/z 564) on an ESI-MS spectrum measured with CD3OD/D2O (1:1), and by the fragment ion [M – SO3 – 11H + 11D]+ (m/z 484) on a CID MS/MS spectrum measured by choosing the ion at m/z 564 as the precursor ion.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zpq0130443310003.jpg

(A) ESI-MS/MS spectra of zetekitoxin AB in the positive ion mode with precursor ions at m/z 553 [M + H]+.(B) The negative ion mode with precursor ions at m/z 551 [M – H]. (Insets) The plausible structures for the major fragment ions observed at m/z 396 (4) and m/z 492 (5). (C) The proposed fragmentation patterns for the model compounds 6 and 8, possessing N–CH2–O moieties. The major fragment ions at m/z 160 and at m/z 156, probably the iminium ions 7 and 9, were shown with precursor ions of [M + Na]+ at m/z 259 (6) and [M + H]+ at m/z 174 (8), respectively.

The partial structure of C14–C18 in 1 and the presence of two isolated methylenes (10-CH2 and 19-CH2) and two singlet methines (H5 and H6) were deduced from 1H NMR (Fig. 2), double-quantum correlation spectroscopy, and total correlation spectroscopy. The 13C NMR spectrum (Fig. 2) showed four carbonyl or guanidinium carbon signals at δ 155.8, 156.5 (C2 and C13, interchangeable assignments), 158.7 (C8) and 159.2 ppm (C20), and one quaternary carbon signal-bearing oxygen at 89.4 ppm (C11). Two quaternary carbons, C4 (86.4 ppm) and C12 (97.4 ppm), were not directly observed in 13C NMR but were deduced from HMBC (Fig. 2). The heteronuclear single-quantum correlations led to assignments of all 1H and 13C signals except those of the seven quaternary carbons. The skeleton of saxitoxin (2), a major component of the paralytic shellfish toxins (18, 19), was indicated to be present in zetekitoxin AB in the same relative stereochemistry as in saxitoxin on comparison of the chemical shifts of the 13C NMR signals and the HMBC of zetekitoxin AB with those of saxitoxin. The 13C-1H HMBC of C2/H6, C4/H5, C4/H6, C4/H10β, C5/H6, C8/H5, C11/H10α, C11/H10β, C12/H5, C12/H10β, and C13/H6 (Fig. 2) and the 15N-1H HMBC of N1/H5 and N7/H6 were shared in the spectra of zetekitoxin AB and saxitoxin. These spectra are reported in Figs. 5–7. The signals of C4, C5, C6, C10, C11, H5, H6, and H10β of zetekitoxin AB were 3.2, 4.2, 1.8, 11.9, 56.1, 0.38, 0.17, and 0.84 ppm shifted downfield from those of saxitoxin (see 1H NMR of 2 in ref. 20) and the signal of C12 was 1.85 ppm shifted upfield (13C NMR shifts: all >1 ppm, 1H NMR shifts: all >0.1 ppm).

Zetekitoxin AB was indicated to possess three side chains at the C6, N7, and C11 positions of the skeleton of saxitoxin (2) as follows. Two cross peaks from C13 and C2 (155.8 and 156.5 ppm, interchangeable assignments) to H6 were shown on the HMBC when the column width for 13C NMR was reduced to about one-fourth of the conventional width to enhance the digital resolution (Fig. 2 Inset). The HMBC of C13/H6 and the chemical shift of C6 (55.6 ppm), typical for nitrogen-substituted methine carbons, indicated that C13 was directly connected to C6, and the C13 resonance was assigned to an amide carbonyl carbon. A similar high-field resonance of an N-hydroxy amide carbon (156.7 ppm in deuterated dimethyl sulfoxide-d6) has been reported for a cyclic hydroxamic acid, 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-benzoxazin-3-one (21). The partial structure of C14–C18 was connected to the oxygenated quaternary carbon C11 based on the HMBC of C10/H14β, C11/H14α, C11/H14β, C11/H15, C12/H14α, C14/H10α, and C14/H10β. The presence of the methyl carbamate moiety [19-CH2O(CO)N] at N7 was suggested by the chemical shifts of 19-CH2 (69.9 ppm, δH, 3.99, 5.05) and C20 (159.2 ppm), and the HMBC of C5/H19a, C19/H5, C20/H19b, and N7/H19b. Isotope shifts in 13C NMR signals, as observed by the chemical shift difference between CD3COOD/D2O (4:96) and CD3COOD/D2O/H2O (4:6:90) solutions, led to partial identification of NH- or OH-bearing carbons (cf., refs. 2224). The shifts for the quaternary carbons were not determined, except for C11, because of the low intensities of the signals. The isotope shifts for C10 and C14 were taken as 0 ppm to express the isotope shifts for all other signals >0 ppm. Significant shifts (>0.1 ppm) were observed for C5 (0.127), C6 (0.151), and C18 (0.130), whereas the shifts of the signals of C11 (0.018), C15 (0.006), C16 (0.011), C17 (0.008), and C19 (0.046) were <0.05 ppm The shifts of C6 and C18 implied connectivity to 1-NH and 18-CH2OH, respectively. The chemical shifts of 18-CH2 (61.7 ppm, δH, 3.64, 3.74), typical for hydroxyl methyl group, also supported this structure. The shift of C5 was interpreted as due to two γ-isotope effects (24) from 1-NH and 9-NH. The absence of hydroxy groups, both at N1 and N9, was judged from relatively smaller downfield shifts of C6 (2.6 ppm) and C4 (4.3 ppm) of zetekitoxin AB from those of 2, since a much larger downfield shift of C6 (11.2 ppm) was found for neosaxitoxin, the N1-hydroxy analog of saxitoxin as reported by Shimizu et al. (19).

Among eight nitrogens in the molecular formula of zetekitoxin AB, six are accounted for and analogous to the two guanidinium groups in the skeleton of saxitoxin (2). Thereby, the remaining two should be in the side chains. Except for the carbons adjacent to nitrogens in the guanidinium groups, only C13 (amide, 155.8 or 156.5 ppm), C15 (methine, 53.7 ppm, dH 4.04), and C20 (carbamate, 159.2 ppm) were assigned to the nitrogen-bearing carbons on basis of their chemical shifts. Thus, two of these carbons should be connected to the same nitrogen, although no HMBC was observed to suggest this connectivity. The nitrogen adjacent to C15 was judged to be substituted by at least two carbons or by OH and SO3H, based on a small isotope shift (0.006). For this reason, a linkage of C13–N–C20 was excluded, since the structures with this linkage, such as 3 (Fig. 1), should possess an NH at C15 or an OH at C17 for which isotope shifts were <0.01 ppm. Also, another structure possessing an N-OH(SO3H) at C15, forming a spiro ring system at C11 with a six-member ring consisting of C11, C14–17, and oxygen, was not compatible with the observed NOE between H14α and H17 (Fig. 8). Further, molecular mechanics energy minimization done on 3 led to the dihedral angle of H5/H6, 143.2°, which is incompatible with an observed value close to 0 Hz for 3JH5/H6. A linkage of C15–N–C20 also was excluded by the nature of such a highly strained structure. On the other hand, C13 and C15 would be located so as to form the lactam of 1 readily, if C13 and C14 were in a cis relationship. The remaining carbamate nitrogen, C20–N, would be located at the terminus of the molecule. The presence of one more ring was suggested by the degree of unsaturation. The chemical shifts of 17-CH2 (68.9 ppm, δH 4.25, 4.26), typical for oxymethylene in a five-membered ring, together with <0.05 ppm isotope shifts for C15 and C17, led to the proposal of a 1,2-oxazolidine ring formed by C15–N, C16, and 17-CH2–O. The remaining oxygenated quaternary carbon, C11, whose isotope shift was 0.018 ppm, was assigned as the carbon bearing a sulfate ester. Satake et al. (22) has reported a <0.05-ppm isotope shift of a carbon-bearing sulfate ester. Finally, N-hydroxylation of the carbamate at C20 was required to satisfy the molecular formula. The relative stereochemistries of C15 and C16 were deduced as in 1 from NOE (H10β/H15, H14α/H17, H14α/H18b, and H15/H16) shown on NOE and rotating frame NOE spectroscopy (see Fig. 8, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site), and on NOEs shown on the NOE difference spectra, together with J values (3JH14α/H15, close to 0 Hz; 3JH14β/H15 = 7.8 Hz; and 3JH15/H16 = 7.8 Hz). Thus, the structure of zetekitoxin AB is proposed as 1 (Fig. 1). The energy-minimized conformation of 1 deduced by molecular mechanics also is shown in Fig. 1. In this conformer, the dihedral angle of H5/H6 was predicted to be 85.6°, which is consonant with the observed value of 3JH5/H6 close to 0 Hz. In toto, the data indicate that 1 is the only possible structure consonant with all the NMR analyses. Assignments of the 1H NMR signals, for the two geminal protons H10α (δ 3.78) and H10β (δ 4.41) of 1, were based on the observed NOEs between H15 (δ 4.04) and H10β (δ 4.41). The large downfield shift (0.84 ppm) of H10β of 1 compared with that of 2 (see 1NMR of 2 in ref. 20) is probably explained by the anisotropic effect from a carbonyl group at C13 of 1 and by the effect of substitution of C11-methylene of 2 by an O-sulfate group and a carbon chain.

The proposed structure 1 was further supported by ESI-MS/MS experiments (Fig. 3 A and B). The CID MS/MS experiments were carried out in positive and negative ion modes, choosing the [M + H]+ ion at m/z 553 and [M – H] ion at m/z 551, respectively, as the precursor ions. In the positive ion mode, prominent fragment ions at m/z 473 [M – SO3 + H]+ and m/z 396 were present. The fragment ion at m/z 396 was interpreted as the iminium ion (4), probably produced by the cleavage of the HO(CO)NH(OH) from the substituent at N7 and SO3 from C11. Similar fragmentation occurred with the model compounds 6 and 8, possessing N–CH2–O moieties (Fig. 3C). The MS/MS experiments, choosing the [M + Na]+ ion at m/z 259 for 6 and the [M + H]+ ion at m/z 174 for 8, provided the major fragment ions at m/z 160 and m/z 156, respectively, probably due to the iminium ions 7 and 9. In the negative ion mode, the MS/MS experiment for 1, choosing the [M – H] ion at m/z 551, provided a prominent fragment ion at m/z 492 (Fig. 3B). This fragment ion was interpreted as 5, produced by the cleavage of N(CO)OH from the substituent at N7. Such fragmentation patterns supported the structure of the side chain at N7 of 1 as CH2OCONHOH.

Pharmacology. The effect of zetekitoxin AB (1) and saxitoxin (2) on voltage-sensitive sodium channels were assessed in Xenopus oocytes, injected with either human heart, rat brain IIa, or rat skeletal muscle sodium channel cRNA. Typical recordings of blockade of currents by 1 and 2 are shown in Fig. 4. The IC50 values for 1 (n = 8–15) with human heart, rat brain, and rat skeletal muscle voltage-dependent sodium channels were 280 ± 3 pM, 6.1 ± 0.4 pM, and 65 ± 10 pM, respectively. The IC50 values for 2 were 160 ± 14 nM, 0.97 ± 0.01 nM, and 4.1 ± 0.5 nM. Thus, zetekitoxin (1) showed the same order of selectivity as saxitoxin but was much more potent at all channels. The extremely high affinity of zetekitoxin for rat brain channels is remarkable.

An external file that holds a picture, illustration, etc.
Object name is zpq0130443310004.jpg

Representative currents for human heart (hH1A), rat skeletal muscle (μl), and rat brain IIa (rBr2A) sodium channels in Xenopus oocytes in the absence or presence of zetekitoxin AB (ZTX) or saxitoxin (STX). See Methods for details.

Discussion

Structure elucidation of 1 was challenging because of seven quaternary carbons among a total of 16 carbons and a limited amount of the material (0.5 μmol), even though the initial data strongly indicated the presence of the skeleton of a known compound, saxitoxin (2). The connectivities of C13–N–C15 and C13–N–C17 in 1 were not directly confirmed by the spectral data. However, 1 appeared to be the only plausible structure that was consonant with all the spectral data. Zetekitoxin AB (1) is characterized by richness of hetero-atoms and by a 1,2-oxazolidine ring-fused lactam moiety, which apparently has never been reported in natural products. Another characteristic feature, an N-hydroxyl carbamate moiety, has been reported in a saxitoxin analog found in a xanthid crab (25). A saxitoxin analog, possessing a carbon chain, CH2COOH, at C11, has been identified in another species of xanthid crab (26). In addition, saxitoxin analogs, having a sulfate ester at C11, are known to be the major components of paralytic shellfish toxins, called gonyautoxins (27). The presence of an analog of saxitoxin in an amphibian is unprecedented.

Further studies may reveal a much wider distribution in nature of saxitoxin analogs similar to the very wide distribution of tetrodotoxin and analogs (28, 29). Both marine bacteria (Moraxella; ref. 30) and freshwater cyanobacteria (Cylindrospermopsis, Aphanizomenon, Anabaena, and Lyngbya species; refs. 20 and 3133) have been found to produce saxitoxin. Recently, evidence that saxitoxin is produced by certain anaerobic bacteria (Enterobacter and Klebsiella species) has been reported (34). Such bacteria were proposed to cause bovine paraplegic syndrome. Thus, bacteria may be found to be responsible for the zetekitoxin AB isolated from the riparian frog A. zeteki. Tetrodotoxin, in the closely related species, A. varius, appears to require symbiotic microorganisms, because such frogs raised in captivity have no detectable tetrodotoxin (35).

The remarkable potency of zetekitoxin AB in blocking voltage-dependent sodium channels was to some extent unexpected. Initial studies had suggested that zetekitoxin (atelopidtoxin) had little effect on action potentials in frog sciatic nerves or on in vivo neuromuscular transmission elicited by stimulation of mammalian sciatic nerves (36). Zetekitoxin AB did block vasoconstriction of rabbit ear arteries elicited by electrical stimulation of sympathetic nerves (5). The cardiac effects of zetekitoxin included atrioventricular blockade, unusual arrhythmias, and ventricular fibrillation (1, 5, 36). Thus, it was concluded from these initial studies that zetekitoxin differed in actions from tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin. Later, it was shown that zetekitoxin (atelopidtoxin) blocked the effect of veratridine, a sodium channel activator in guinea pig brain slices, as did tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin (37). Our data resolve this quandary and provide the chemical identification of zetekitoxin as a saxitoxin analog. Zetekitoxin AB shows an affinity profile similar to that of saxitoxin for brain, heart, and muscle sodium channels. Nevertheless, zetekitoxin AB has considerably higher affinity for each isoform than saxitoxin. Further studies on this potent and selective neurotoxin are warranted should synthetic or bacterial sources be developed.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Figures:

Acknowledgments

This work is dedicated to the memory of the late Harry S. Mosher. We thank Dr. M. Satake (Tohoku University) for discussions and Dr. H. Naoki (Suntory Institute for Bioorganic Research, Osaka) for measurement of ESI-TOF MS/MS spectra. This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid 12045210 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan and 14560080 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and funding from the Fujisawa Foundation and the Suntory Institute for Bioorganic Research (to M.Y.-Y.), a Scientist Development Award from the National American Heart Association (to S.C.D.), a Veterans Affairs MERIT award (to S.C.D.), National Institutes of Health Award HL64828 (to S.C.D.), and a Southeast Affiliate American Heart Association postdoctoral fellowship award (to A.P.).

Notes

Abbreviations: CID, collision-induced dissociation; ESI, electrospray-ionization; TOF, time-of-flight; HMBC, heteronuclear multiple-bond correlations; NOE, nuclear Overhauser effect.

References

1. Fuhrman, F. A., Fuhrman, G. J. & Mosher, H. S. (1969) Science 165, 1376–1377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Shindelman, J., Mosher, H. S. & Fuhrman, F. A. (1969) Toxicon 7, 315–319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Kim, Y. H., Brown, G. B., Mosher, H. S. & Fuhrman, F. A. (1975) Science 189, 151–152. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Yotsu, M., Yasumoto, T., Kim, Y. H., Naoki, H. & Kao, C. Y. (1990) Tetrahedron Lett. 31, 3187–3190. [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, G. B., Kim, Y. H., Küntzel, H., Mosher, H. S., Fuhrman, G. J. & Fuhrman, F. A. (1977) Toxicon 15, 115–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Daly, J. W., Gusovsky, F., Myers, C. W., Yotsu-Yamashita, M. & Yasumoto, T. (1994) Toxicon 32, 279–285. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Mebs, D., Yotsu-Yamashita, M., Yasumoto, T., Lötters, S. & Schlüter, A. (1995) Toxicon 33, 246–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Yotsu-Yamashita, M. & Mebs, D. (2001) Toxicon 39, 1261–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9. Tanu, M. B., Mahmud, Y., Tsuruda, K., Arakawa, O. & Noguchi, T. (2001) Toxicon 39, 937–941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Pires, O. R., Jr., Sebben, A., Schwartz, E. F., Largura, S. W. R., Bloch, C., Jr., Morales, R. A. V. & Schwartz, C. A. (2002) Toxicon 40, 761–766. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Flier, J., Edwards, M. W., Daly, J. W. & Myers, C. W. (1980) Science 208, 503–505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Harada, T., Oshima, Y., Kamaiya, H. & Yasumoto, T. (1982) Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi, 48, 821–825. [Google Scholar]
13. Burkert, U. & Allinger, N. L. (1982) Moleuclar Mechanics, ACS Monograph 177 (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC).
14. Clark, M., Cramer, R. D., III, & Van Opdenbosch, N. (1989) J. Comput. Chem. 10, 982–1012. [Google Scholar]
15. Davies, G., Russell, A. T., Sanderson, A. J. & Simpson, S. J. (1999) Tetrahedron Lett. 40, 4391–4394. [Google Scholar]
16. Choudhary, G., Shang, L., Li, X. F. & Dudley, S. C. (2002) Biophys. J. 83, 912–919. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Penzotti, J. L., Lipkind, G., Fozzard, H. A. & Dudley, S. C., Jr. (2001) Biophys. J. 80, 698–706. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Schantz, E. J., Ghazarossian, V. E., Schnoes, H. K., Strong, F. M., Springer, J. P., Pezzanite, J. O. & Clardy, J. (1975) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 97, 1238–1239. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Shimizu, Y., Hsu, C. F., Fallon, W. E., Oshima, Y., Miura, I. & Nakanishi, K. (1978) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 6791–6793. [Google Scholar]
20. Onodera, H., Satake, M., Oshima, Y., Yasumoto, T. & Camichiael, W. W. (1997) Nat. Toxins 5, 146–151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Atkinson, J., Mornad, P. & Arnason, J. T. (1991) J. Org. Chem. 56, 1788–1800. [Google Scholar]
22. Satake, M., Murata, M., Nagai, H., Yasumoto, T., Fujita, T. & Naoki, H. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 9859–9861. [Google Scholar]
23. Satake, M., Ofuji, K., Naoki, H., James, K. J., Furey, A., MacMahon, T., Silke, J. & Yasumoto, T. (1998) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 9967–9968. [Google Scholar]
24. Bosco, M., Picotti, F., Radoicovich, A. & Rizzo, R. (2000) Biopolymers 53, 272–280. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Arakawa, O., Noguchi, T., Shida, Y. & Onoue, Y. (1994) Toxicon 32, 175–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Arakawa, O., Nishio, S., Noguchi, T., Shida, Y. & Onoue, Y. (1995) Toxicon 33, 1577–1584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Oshima, Y. (1995) J. AOAC Int. 78, 528–532. [Google Scholar]
28. Yasumoto, T. & Yotsu-Yamashita, M. (1996) J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 15, 80–90. [Google Scholar]
29. Miyazawa, K. & Noguchi, T. (2001) J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 20, 11–33. [Google Scholar]
30. Kodama, M., Ogata, T., Sakameto, S., Sato, S., Honda, T. & Miwatani, T. (1990) Toxicon 28, 707–714. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Lagos, N., Onodrva, H., Zagatto, P. A., Andrinolo, D., Azeuedo, M. F. Q. & Oshima, Y. (1999) Toxicon 37, 1359–1373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Mahmood, N. A. & Carmichael, W. W. (1986) Toxicon 24, 175–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Onodera, H., Oshima, Y., Yasumoto, T., Watanabe, M. F., Watanabe, M., Bolch, C. J. & Blackburn, S. (1996) in Harmful and Toxic Algal Blooms, eds. Yasumoto, T., Oshino, Y. & Fukuyo, Y. (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Communication-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris), pp. 563–566.
34. Sevcik, C., Noriega, J. & D'Suze, G. (2003) Toxicon 42, 359–366. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Daly, J. W., Padgett, W. L., Saunders, R. L. & Cover, J. F., Jr. (1997) Toxicon 35, 705–709. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Ranney, B. K., Fuhrman, G. J. & Fuhrman, F. A. (1970) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 175, 368–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37. Huang, M., Shimizu, H. & Daly, J. W. (1972) J. Med. Chem. 15, 462–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

-