Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e90420.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090420. eCollection 2014.

Changes in oxidative stress markers and biological markers of muscle injury with aging at rest and in response to an exhaustive exercise

Affiliations

Changes in oxidative stress markers and biological markers of muscle injury with aging at rest and in response to an exhaustive exercise

Mohamed Amine Bouzid et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether oxidative stress markers and biomarkers of muscle injury would be affected by aging at rest and in response to an incremental exhaustive exercise.

Methods: Fifteen young (20.3 ± 2.8 years) and fifteen older adults (65.1 ± 3.5 years) performed an incremental cycle ergometer test to exhaustion. Before and after exercise, oxidative stress [superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutathione reductase (GR), ascorbic acid, α-Tocopherol, malondialdehyde (MDA)] and muscle injury [creatine kinase (CK), lactate deshydrogenase (LDH)] biomarkers were assessed.

Results: At rest, there was no difference in oxidative stress markers and LDH level between the groups, however CK was significantly higher in the young group than the elderly group (p<0.05). During recovery, in comparison with resting values, a significant increase in SOD (1092 ± 145.9 vs. 1243 ± 98 U/g Hb), GPX (67.4 ± 12.7 vs. 79.2 ± 15.6 U/g Hb) and GR (6.5 ± 0.9 vs. 7.7 ± 0.5 U/g Hb) activities were observed only in the young group (p<0.05). MDA has increased only in the older group (0.54 ± 0.2 vs. 0.79 ± 0.2 µmol/l) (p<0.01). CK increased in both groups (young group: 122.5 ± 22.2 vs. 161.9 ± 18.7 UI/l; older group: 88.8 ± 34.1 vs. 111.1 ± 25.9 UI/l) (p<0.01), however LDH has increased only in the young group (400.5 ± 22.2 vs. 485 ± 18.7 UI/l) (p<0.01) without alteration in the older group (382.8 ± 34.1 vs. 418.5 ± 25.9 UI/l).

Conclusions: These findings indicate that aging is associated with a decrease in antioxidant efficiency and an increase in oxidative stress damage. Furthermore, older adults would not more susceptible to exercise-induced muscle injury than young people.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SOD at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
*: significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.05). #: significant difference between young and elderly subjects (p<0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2. GPX at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
*: significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3. GR at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
*: significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.05). #: significant difference between young and elderly subjects (p<0.05).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Ascorbic acid and α-Tocopherol at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
A = Ascorbic acid, B = α-Tocopherol.
Figure 5
Figure 5. MDA at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
**: significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.01). #: Significant difference between young and elderly subjects (p<0.05).
Figure 6
Figure 6. CK at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
**: significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.01). #: Significant difference between young and elderly subjects (p<0.05).
Figure 7
Figure 7. LDH at rest and at the recovery in the young and the elderly subjects.
**: Significant difference between rest and recovery period (p<0.01). #: significant difference between young and elderly subjects (p<0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang CH, Wu SB, Wu YT, Wei YH (2013) Oxidative stress response elicited by mitochondrial dysfunction: implication in the pathophysiology of aging. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 238: 450–60. - PubMed
    1. Wei YH, Lee HC (2002) Oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA mutation, and impairment of antioxidant enzymes in aging. Exp Biol Med 227: 671–82. - PubMed
    1. Mutlu-Türkoğlu U, Ilhan E, Oztezcan S, Kuru A, Aykaç-Toker G, et al. (2003) Age related increases in plasma malondialdehyde and protein carbonyl levels and lymphocyte DNA damage in elderly subjects. Clin Biochem 36: 397–400. - PubMed
    1. Kasapoglu M, Ozben T (2001) Alterations of antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress markers in aging. Exp Gerontol 36: 209–20. - PubMed
    1. Gianni P, Jan KJ, Douglas MJ, Stuart PM, Tarnopolsky MA (2004) Oxidative stress and the mitochondrial theory of aging in human skeletal muscle. Exp Gerontol 39: 1391–400. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

These authors have no support or funding to report.
-